Extreme Speech and Democracy - Rilegato

Rilegato

ISBN 10: 0199548781 ISBN 13: 9780199548781

Casa editrice: OUP Oxford, 2009

Riassunto

A fundamental precept of all liberal democracies is a commitment to free speech. However, democracies differ fundamentally when addressing the constitutionality of laws regulating certain kinds of speech. In the United States, the commitment to free speech in the First Amendment has been held by the Supreme Court to protect the public expression of the most noxious racist ideology and hence to render unconstitutional even narrow restrictions on hate speech. In contrast, governments have been accorded considerable leeway to restrict racist and other extreme expression in almost every other democracy, including Canada, the United Kingdom and other European countries. This book considers the constitutionality of hate speech regulation, and examines how liberal democracies have adopted fundamental differences in the way they respond to racist or extreme expressions.

What accounts for the marked differences in attitude towards the constitutionality of hate speech regulation? Does hate speech regulation violate the core free speech principle constitutive of democracy? Has the traditional US position on extreme expressions justifiably not found favour elsewhere? Should, or could, other values such as the commitment to equality or dignity legitimately override the right to free speech in some circumstances? This collection of papers from some of the top free speech thinkers and writers today attempts to analyse and answer some of these fundamental questions that confront liberal democracies faced with extreme expressions.

Su questo libro

Recensione:

'...the contributors include many of the illustrious names in contemporary free speech scholarship, and the quality of the contributions is on the whole high" (Lawrence R. Douglas, Times Literary Supplement)

What are the appropriate limits to freedom of expression in societies that wish to be democratic, multi-cultural, and committed to the human rights of all? Ivan Hare and James Weinstein, a UK human rights practitioner and a US academic, have assembled a dazzling array of talent from a variety of disciplines, jurisdictions, and viewpoints to explain and debate a controversy that is intellectually complex, politically explosive, and as current as today's news. Extreme Speech and Democracy is a mine of information and argument that will be quarried for years to come. This is quite simply the most sophisticated, penetrating, and ambitious study of these issues available. (Christopher McCrudden, FBA, Professor of Human Rights Law, University of Oxford)

The papers in this book bring a penetrating scholarship to the law relating to extreme speech-and to the political philosophy which is the subject's real challenge. Whether you believe in free expression warts and all, or in censorship for the sake of public tranquillity, you will find these contributions a major intellectual resource. (Lord Justice Laws)

compendious, thoughtful, learned and very well produced and laid out. The topic is both provocative and important, being no less than the future of our liberal culture and the task it faces in accommodating itself to the challenge of extremism without destroying all that is good about itself in the process...The book is one to be read through from start to finish or enjoyed in bite-sized chunks grabbed as the opportunity arises...The book's many contributors have various responses to the issue of controlling as well as celebrating speech but it is a tribute both to themselves and to the editors that few deny that the issue is one which needs properly to be addressed. The book is all the better as a defender of free speech (and liberal values) for taking its opponents so seriously. (Conor Gearty, London School of Economics, Entertainment Law Review, Volume 20, issue 8, 2009)

...whoever takes whatever stand in a debate so intellectually complex and politically explosive as that about the limits of the freedom of expression, must be able to judge all the arguments for and against, recognise the false justifications on both sides, and formulate a clear position. For once, the flap text does not disappoint: these contributions are a major intellectual resource for that endeavour (Chrisje Brants, Utrecht University, The Netherlands, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 28.2)

...This book makes for a very valuable and interesting read, not only for those dealing with the legal dimension of 'hate speech', but also for others interested in that crucially important sphere of public life and debate within democratic society. (Aleksandra Gliszczynska-Grabias, Polish Academy of Sciences, Human Rights Law Review 10:3)

It is rare to see a book full of such deep thoughts expressed with such clarity...the essays are stylish and structured. (Rosalind MM McInnes, Principal Solicitor, BBC Scotland)

L'autore:

Ivan Hare is a Barrister at Blackstone Chambers and a former Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge.

James Weinstein is the Amelia D. Lewis Professor of Constitutional Law at Sandra Day O'Connor College of Law, Arizona State University

Contributors:
Eric Barendt
David Bodney
Tufyal Choudhury
Ian Cram
David Edgar
Carolyn Evans
John Finnis
David Fraser
Dieter Grimm
Ivan Hare
Eric Heinze
Ian Leigh
Jose Liht
Maleiha Malik
Dominic McGoldrick
Robert Post
Amnon Reichman
Jacob Rowbottom
Sara Savage
Wayne Sumner
Patrick Weil
James Weinstein
Michael Whine
David Williams

Su questa edizione

• Editore: OUP Oxford
• Data di pubblicazione: 2009
• ISBN 10: 0199548781
• ISBN 13: 9780199548781
• Rilegatura: Copertina rigida
• Numero di pagine: 712
• Redattore: Hare Ivan, Weinstein James