Articoli correlati a The International Criminal Court from a Liberal Perspective:...

The International Criminal Court from a Liberal Perspective: Explaining the Jordanian Puzzle - Brossura

 
9783656389637: The International Criminal Court from a Liberal Perspective: Explaining the Jordanian Puzzle
Vedi tutte le copie di questo ISBN:
 
 
Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: International Organisations, grade: 1,3, University of Tubingen (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Introduction to International Relations, language: English, abstract: [...] What seems to be the greatest puzzle about the "ICC-story" is the fact that the Statute was adopted despite US opposition. It seemed impossible that an independent court could be created without the support of the US. And it is indeed remarkable that so many states agreed on a strong, independent ICC although the US also launched an active campaign against it and tried to pressure states into signing bilateral agreements in order to prevent US citizens from becoming subjects to ICC jurisdiction. But, in my opinion, this is not the only puzzle, because there was another state that acted differently than expected. This state is Jordan, who was the only Arab state not only to support the ICC but also to join the Like-Minded Group prior to the conference. It is not surprising that authoritarian regimes opposed the court. It is surprising however, that Jordan was the exception to that rule and I think that decision deserves to be examined further. While republican liberalism offers an explanation to US behavior regarding the ICC, it fails at explaining the Jordanian case. It predicts that authoritarian regimes will side with well established democracies in opposition to binding international human rights regimes. Although this did not count for Jordan, I still think that liberalism can explain why the Kingdom supported the ICC. In order to prove this hypothesis, I will outline the basic assumptions of (republican) liberalism. Afterwards I will briefly describe the political, economic and societal situation in Jordan in order to identify the aspects needed to apply the theory. Finally, I will show how liberalism can explain why Jordan as an authoritarian regime supported the ICC although it was not "su

Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.

  • EditoreGRIN Verlag
  • Data di pubblicazione2013
  • ISBN 10 3656389632
  • ISBN 13 9783656389637
  • RilegaturaCopertina flessibile
  • Numero edizione2
  • Numero di pagine20

Spese di spedizione: EUR 23,00
Da: Germania a: U.S.A.

Destinazione, tempi e costi

Aggiungere al carrello

I migliori risultati di ricerca su AbeBooks

Immagini fornite dal venditore

Anna Fuchs
Editore: GRIN Verlag Mrz 2013 (2013)
ISBN 10: 3656389632 ISBN 13: 9783656389637
Nuovo Taschenbuch Quantità: 2
Print on Demand
Da:
BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.
(Bergisch Gladbach, Germania)
Valutazione libreria

Descrizione libro Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: International Organisations, grade: 1,3, University of Tubingen (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Introduction to International Relations, language: English, abstract: [.] What seems to be the greatest puzzle about the 'ICC-story' is the fact that the Statutewas adopted despite US opposition. It seemed impossible that an independent courtcould be created without the support of the US. And it is indeed remarkable that somany states agreed on a strong, independent ICC although the US also launched an activecampaign against it and tried to pressure states into signing bilateral agreements inorder to prevent US citizens from becoming subjects to ICC jurisdiction. But, in myopinion, this is not the only puzzle, because there was another state that acted differentlythan expected. This state is Jordan, who was the only Arab state not only to support theICC but also to join the Like-Minded Group prior to the conference. It is not surprisingthat authoritarian regimes opposed the court. It is surprising however, that Jordan wasthe exception to that rule and I think that decision deserves to be examined further.While republican liberalism offers an explanation to US behavior regarding the ICC, itfails at explaining the Jordanian case. It predicts that authoritarian regimes will sidewith well established democracies in opposition to binding international human rights regimes. Although this did not count for Jordan, I still think that liberalism can explainwhy the Kingdom supported the ICC. In order to prove this hypothesis, I will outline thebasic assumptions of (republican) liberalism. Afterwards I will briefly describe thepolitical, economic and societal situation in Jordan in order to identify the aspectsneeded to apply the theory. Finally, I will show how liberalism can explain why Jordanas an authoritarian regime supported the ICC although it was not 'supposed to'. 20 pp. Englisch. Codice articolo 9783656389637

Informazioni sul venditore | Contatta il venditore

Compra nuovo
EUR 13,99
Convertire valuta

Aggiungere al carrello

Spese di spedizione: EUR 23,00
Da: Germania a: U.S.A.
Destinazione, tempi e costi
Immagini fornite dal venditore

Anna Fuchs
Editore: GRIN Verlag (2013)
ISBN 10: 3656389632 ISBN 13: 9783656389637
Nuovo Taschenbuch Quantità: 1
Da:
AHA-BUCH GmbH
(Einbeck, Germania)
Valutazione libreria

Descrizione libro Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2012 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: International Organisations, grade: 1,3, University of Tubingen (Institut für Politikwissenschaft), course: Introduction to International Relations, language: English, abstract: [.] What seems to be the greatest puzzle about the 'ICC-story' is the fact that the Statutewas adopted despite US opposition. It seemed impossible that an independent courtcould be created without the support of the US. And it is indeed remarkable that somany states agreed on a strong, independent ICC although the US also launched an activecampaign against it and tried to pressure states into signing bilateral agreements inorder to prevent US citizens from becoming subjects to ICC jurisdiction. But, in myopinion, this is not the only puzzle, because there was another state that acted differentlythan expected. This state is Jordan, who was the only Arab state not only to support theICC but also to join the Like-Minded Group prior to the conference. It is not surprisingthat authoritarian regimes opposed the court. It is surprising however, that Jordan wasthe exception to that rule and I think that decision deserves to be examined further.While republican liberalism offers an explanation to US behavior regarding the ICC, itfails at explaining the Jordanian case. It predicts that authoritarian regimes will sidewith well established democracies in opposition to binding international human rights regimes. Although this did not count for Jordan, I still think that liberalism can explainwhy the Kingdom supported the ICC. In order to prove this hypothesis, I will outline thebasic assumptions of (republican) liberalism. Afterwards I will briefly describe thepolitical, economic and societal situation in Jordan in order to identify the aspectsneeded to apply the theory. Finally, I will show how liberalism can explain why Jordanas an authoritarian regime supported the ICC although it was not 'supposed to'. Codice articolo 9783656389637

Informazioni sul venditore | Contatta il venditore

Compra nuovo
EUR 15,95
Convertire valuta

Aggiungere al carrello

Spese di spedizione: EUR 32,99
Da: Germania a: U.S.A.
Destinazione, tempi e costi