In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which one is positively forbidden to to do.
Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widely regarded as an inadequate account of morality. Although Professor Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism.
He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure from consequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide a satisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes on to argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the best outcomes.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
From the reviews of the first edition: "an intelligent, substantive, and challenging book ... Scheffler's ... discussion of the problems of consequentialism is superior to any I have read"Philosophical Review
In this book Samuel Scheffler discusses topics of great practical and theoretical interest ... Scheffler's challenge must be taken very seriously, and it is one of the merits of this valuable book that it asks a question that must surely be answered. (Philippa Foot, Times Literary Supplement)
one of the most interesting works of moral philosophy that I have read in years (Shelly Kagan, Philosophy and Public Affairs)
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
EUR 56,39 per la spedizione da U.S.A. a Italia
Destinazione, tempi e costiEUR 17,08 per la spedizione da U.S.A. a Italia
Destinazione, tempi e costiDa: Recycle Bookstore, San Jose, CA, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condizione: Good +. Condizione sovraccoperta: Very Good. Priced As-Is! Photos available upon request! Book has light bumping to edges of spine and corners and mild underlining and annotating to various pages throughout; dust jacket has light rubbing to edges of cover and spine, light sunfading to spine and edges of cover near hinge, and mild rubbing to cover. otherwise book is in good condition with a bright cover, a solid binding, and now mylar laminated. Would be in very good condition if there was no underlining and annotating. Codice articolo 1032085
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. Codice articolo 1689273-n
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Brook Bookstore On Demand, Napoli, NA, Italia
Condizione: new. Questo è un articolo print on demand. Codice articolo d7f8f0c2d1deeb83cbb255212124f1d9
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. Codice articolo 1689273-n
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Midtown Scholar Bookstore, Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.
hardcover. Condizione: Good. Some pencil markings. Torn/worn dj. Good hardcover with some shelfwear; may have previous owner's name inside. Standard-sized. Codice articolo mon0000198905
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Regno Unito
Hardback. Condizione: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days. 427. Codice articolo B9780198235101
Quantità: 15 disponibili
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
Buch. Condizione: Neu. Neuware - In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which one is positively forbidden to do so. Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widelyregarded as an inadequate account of morality. Although Samuel Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes toreconsider the rejection of consequentialism. He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure from consequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide asatisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes on to argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the bestoutcomes. Codice articolo 9780198235101
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Da: CitiRetail, Stevenage, Regno Unito
Hardcover. Condizione: new. Hardcover. In contemporary philosophy, substantive moral theories are typically classified as either consequentialist or deontological. Standard consequentialist theories insist, roughly, that agents must always act so as to produce the best available outcomes overall. Standard deontological theories, by contrast, maintain that there are some circumstances where one is permitted but not required to produce the best overall results, and still other circumstances in which oneis positively forbidden to to do.Classical utilitarianism is the most familiar consequentialist view, but it is widely regarded as an inadequate account of morality. AlthoughProfessor Scheffler agrees with this assessment, he also believes that consequentialism seems initially plausible, and that there is a persistent air of paradox surrounding typical deontological views. In this book, therefore, he undertakes to reconsider the rejection of consequentialism.He argues that it is possible to provide a rationale for the view that agents need not always produce the best possible overall outcomes, and this motivates one departure fromconsequentialism; but he shows that it is surprisingly difficult to provide a satisfactory rationale for the view that there are times when agents must not produce the best possible overall outcomes. He goes onto argue for a hitherto neglected type of moral conception, according to which agents are always permitted, but not always required, to produce the best outcomes. A new edition the reconsideration of the case against consequentialism supplemented with three subsequently published essays in which he responds to criticism of the original text and further develops various of its themes and arguments. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability. Codice articolo 9780198235101
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Regno Unito
HRD. Condizione: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Codice articolo L1-9780198235101
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
HRD. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Codice articolo L1-9780198235101
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili