Articoli correlati a Moral Thinking: It's Levels, Methods and Point
Compra nuovo
Visualizza questo articolo
EUR 88,57
EUR 25,47 per la spedizione da U.S.A. a Italia
Destinazione, tempi e costi
Risultati della ricerca per Moral Thinking: It's Levels, Methods and Point
Foto dell'editore
Moral Thinking : Its Levels, Method, and Point
Editore:
Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1982
ISBN 10: 0198246595
ISBN 13: 9780198246596
Antico o usato
Rilegato
Da: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A.
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Condizione: Good. Former library book; may include library markings. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages. Codice articolo GRP30407252
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Foto dell'editore
Moral Thinking : Its Levels, Method, and Point
Editore:
Oxford University Press, Incorporated, 1982
ISBN 10: 0198246595
ISBN 13: 9780198246596
Antico o usato
Rilegato
Da: Better World Books, Mishawaka, IN, U.S.A.
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Condizione: Good. Used book that is in clean, average condition without any missing pages. Codice articolo GRP92116643
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Foto dell'editore
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point
Da: Anybook.com, Lincoln, Regno Unito
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Condizione: Fair. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. Book contains pencil markings. In fair condition, suitable as a study copy. Dust jacket in good condition. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,500grams, ISBN:0198246595. Codice articolo 9844305
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Foto dell'editore
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point
Editore:
Oxford University Press, 1982
ISBN 10: 0198246595
ISBN 13: 9780198246596
Antico o usato
Rilegato
Da: Labyrinth Books, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Condizione: Acceptable. Codice articolo 253225
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Foto dell'editore
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Methods and Point
Da: Toscana Books, AUSTIN, TX, U.S.A.
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Hardcover. Condizione: new. Excellent Condition.Excels in customer satisfaction, prompt replies, and quality checks. Codice articolo Scanned0198246595
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Immagini fornite dal venditore
Freedom And Reason
Editore:
Oxford / Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1963
ISBN 10: 0198246595
ISBN 13: 9780198246596
Antico o usato
Rilegato
Prima edizione
Da: Arroyo Seco Books, Pasadena, Member IOBA, Pasadena, CA, U.S.A.
Valutazione del venditore 5 su 5 stelle
Black Cloth. Condizione: Near Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Very Good + Dust Jacket. First Edition. Viii, 228 Pp. Blue Cloth, Gilt. First Printing. A Near Fine Book, No Wear Or Marks, Gilt Brilliant. Dj Not Price-Clipped (15S), Rubbing And Short Tears At Corners With 1" Closed Tear At Top Of Rear Flap Fold. Per Wikipedia, "Richard Mervyn Hare (1919 - 2002), Usually Cited As R. M. Hare, Was A British Moral Philosopher Who Held The Post Of White's Professor Of Moral Philosophy At The University Of Oxford From 1966 Until 1983. He Subsequently Taught For A Number Of Years At The University Of Florida. His Meta-Ethical Theories Were Influential During The Second Half Of The Twentieth Century. Hare Is Best Known For His Development Of Prescriptivism As A Meta-Ethical Theory, Which He Argues Is Supported By Analysis Of Formal Features Of Moral Discourse, And For His Defense Of Preference Utilitarianism Based On His Prescriptivism. In A Series Of Books, Especially The Language Of Morals (1952), Freedom And Reason (1963), And Moral Thinking (1981), Hare Gave Shape To A Theory That He Called Universal Prescriptivism. According To This, Moral Terms Such As 'Good', 'Ought' And 'Right' Have Two Logical Or Semantic Properties: Universalizability And Prescriptivity. By The Former, He Meant That Moral Judgments Must Identify The Situation They Describe According To A Finite Set Of Universal Terms, Excluding Proper Names, But Not Definite Descriptions. By The Latter, He Meant That Moral Agents Must Perform Those Acts They Consider Themselves To Have An Obligation To Perform Whenever They Are Physically And Psychologically Able To Do So. In Other Words, He Argued That It Made No Sense For Someone To Say, Sincerely: "I Ought To Do X", And Then Fail To Do X. Codice articolo 038174
Quantità: 1 disponibili