This book defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Professor Alexander is a Warren Distinguished Professor of Law at University of San Diego School of Law. He is the author of: Is There a Right to Freedom of Expression? (Cambridge, 2005); (with Emily Sherwin) The Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001); Constitutionalism: Philosophical Foundations (Cambridge, 1998); (with Paul Horton) Whom Does the Constitution Command? (1988); several anthologies; and over 160 articles, book chapters, and review essays in jurisprudence, constitutional law, criminal law, and normative ethics. He has been a member of the faculty at the University of San Diego School of Law since 1970. He is co-editor of the journal Legal Theory (Cambridge), and he serves on the editorial boards of Ethics, Law and Philosophy and Criminal Law and Philosophy. He is co-executive director of the Institute for Law and Philosophy at the University of San Diego, and he is past president of AMINTAPHIL.
Professor Sherwin is Professor of Law at Cornell University Law School. She specializes in jurisprudence, property, and remedies. She is the author (with Larry Alexander) of The Rule of Rules: Morality, Rules, and the Dilemmas of Law (2001) and has published numerous book chapters, articles, and reviews in her subjects of specialty. She was a member of the faculty at the University of Kentucky College of Law from 1985 to 1990 and the University of San Diego School of Law from 1990 to 2003, when she moved to Cornell University. She is a member of the advisory committee for the ALI's Restatement (Third) of Restitution and Unjust Enrichment and a regular participant in roundtable conferences of the University of San Diego's Institute for Law and Philosophy.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
EUR 5,12 per la spedizione in U.S.A.
Destinazione, tempi e costiEUR 3,40 per la spedizione in U.S.A.
Destinazione, tempi e costiDa: Michener & Rutledge Booksellers, Inc., Baldwin City, KS, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condizione: Very Good. Light wear to covers, otherwise text clean and tight; no dust jacket; Cambridge Introductions to Philosophy and Law; 9.26 X 6.36 X 1.19 inches; 428 pages. Codice articolo 216922
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Phatpocket Limited, Waltham Abbey, HERTS, Regno Unito
Condizione: Good. Your purchase helps support Sri Lankan Children's Charity 'The Rainbow Centre'. Ex-library, so some stamps and wear, but in good overall condition. Our donations to The Rainbow Centre have helped provide an education and a safe haven to hundreds of children who live in appalling conditions. Codice articolo Z1-H-013-01624
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. pp. 264. Codice articolo 26616297
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. Codice articolo ABLIING23Feb2416190012579
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Best Price, Torrance, CA, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. SUPER FAST SHIPPING. Codice articolo 9780521703956
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. pp. 264. Codice articolo 8313014
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: California Books, Miami, FL, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. Codice articolo I-9780521703956
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Grand Eagle Retail, Mason, OH, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do. Other modes of reasoning popularly associated with the common law, such as analogical reasoning, are spurious. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Codice articolo 9780521703956
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germania
Condizione: New. pp. 264. Codice articolo 18616291
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Rarewaves.com USA, London, LONDO, Regno Unito
Paperback. Condizione: New. Demystifying Legal Reasoning defends the proposition that there are no special forms of reasoning peculiar to law. Legal decision makers engage in the same modes of reasoning that all actors use in deciding what to do: open-ended moral reasoning, empirical reasoning, and deduction from authoritative rules. This book addresses common law reasoning when prior judicial decisions determine the law, and interpretation of texts. In both areas, the popular view that legal decision makers practise special forms of reasoning is false. Codice articolo LU-9780521703956
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili