The framing of this special issue was influenced by the conversation analytic (CA) position on context. Taking a clear stance that argues for a restricted use of context in analysis, the CA position became the one that authors positioned their views in relation to either drawing out novel implications of a CA commitment or arguing why a CA perspective on context was problematic. In each article, a claim about context is advanced in the context of a particular kind of talk or text. The six articles in this issue form three definable sets: two articles that draw on context as background in a straightforward manner, two that do considerable work to get the concept of context to behave, and two that in one way or another reverse what is focal in dominant definitions. By offering two frames to reflect about the articles, as well as providing the initial conference conversation that stimulated the articles in this special issue, the contributors seek to enliven and advance the next round of thought, talk, and writing about context.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Volume 31, Number 1, 1998 Contents: K. Tracy, Analyzing Context: Framing the Discussion. Part I: Locating Context in Talk. J.A. Potter, Cognition as Context (Whose Cognition?) R. Buttny, Putting Prior Talk Into Context: Reported Speech and the Reporting Context. R. Hopper, C. LeBaron, How Gender Creeps Into Talk. Part II: Situating Talk and Text in Context. K. Aronsson, Identity-in-Interaction and Social Choreography. K.L. Fitch, Text and Context: A Problematic Distinction for Ethnography. J.M. Swales, Textography: Toward a Contextualization of Written Academic Discourse. Concluding Overview: A. Pomerantz, Multiple Interpretations of Context: How Are They Useful?
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.