Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorisations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favour of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Ian Eagles holds a chair in law at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand and is Visiting Professor at the University of New South Wales.
Louise Longdin holds a chair in law at Auckland University of Technology in New Zealand and is a Visiting Professor at the University of New South Wales. She is is also Director of the Competition Law and Policy Institute of New Zealand.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Da: Wallace Books, Portland, OR, U.S.A.
Soft cover. Condizione: As New. Unread softcover book in As New condition. We ship promptly from the United States and in a box. Codice articolo 36,075x
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Wallace Books, Portland, OR, U.S.A.
Soft cover. Condizione: Fine. Softcover book in Fine condition. Pages are completely clean and contain no additional markings. NOT a former library book. We ship promptly from the United States and in a box! Codice articolo 35,036x
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Da: PsychoBabel & Skoob Books, Didcot, Regno Unito
Paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Paperback in excellent condition throughout, with no notable faults. TS. Used. Codice articolo 607632
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Kloof Booksellers & Scientia Verlag, Amsterdam, Paesi Bassi
Condizione: as new. Oxford : Hart Publishing, 2011. Paperback. 298 pp. English text. Condition : as new. - Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This, however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions, which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorizations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favor of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Condition : as new copy. ISBN 9781841138732. Keywords : RECHT, Intellectual property. Codice articolo 71343
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Basi6 International, Irving, TX, U.S.A.
Condizione: Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service. Codice articolo ABEOCT25-279606
Quantità: 3 disponibili
Da: PBShop.store US, Wood Dale, IL, U.S.A.
PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Codice articolo L0-9781841138732
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Regno Unito
PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Delivered from our UK warehouse in 4 to 14 business days. THIS BOOK IS PRINTED ON DEMAND. Established seller since 2000. Codice articolo L0-9781841138732
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. In. Codice articolo ria9781841138732_new
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Kennys Bookshop and Art Galleries Ltd., Galway, GY, Irlanda
Condizione: New. Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Num Pages: 298 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: KCA; LNR. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 161 x 233 x 17. Weight in Grams: 470. . 2011. Paperback. . . . . Codice articolo V9781841138732
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. In competition cases, by contrast, economists are familiar figures in the courtroom and the language of economics is scattered throughout the judgments of even the highest courts. One might expect, therefore, that refusals to license intellectual property would generate the same fruitful symbiosis between law and economics when those refusals surface in competition proceedings. This however, has not been how the law on this subject has developed in most jurisdictions. Courts and enforcement agencies faced with a unilateral refusal to license have instead tended to retreat into sketchily articulated black letter rules and presumptions which then have to be fenced off from the rest of competition law by economically irrelevant qualifications and distinctions based on private law categorisations of, and rationales for, individual intellectual property rights. This bypassing of case-by-case analysis in favour of more traditional modes of legal reasoning is not entirely the fault of lawyers. Economists have contributed to this state of affairs by urging judges and regulators to convert empirically undernourished theories about the proper role of intellectual property in a market economy into rules of law and evidentiary presumptions intended to be binding in future cases. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Economic analysis rarely appears on the judicial horizon in intellectual property litigation. How this came about and what it means for the future of effective competition enforcement globally are the twin concerns of this book. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Codice articolo 9781841138732
Quantità: 1 disponibili