by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach? In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation? When Socrates asked, for example, "What is virtue?", he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Foreword — The Modernity of Rhetoric.- Formal Logic and Informal Logic.- Logic and Argumentation.- To Reason While Speaking.- Organization and Articulation of Verbal Exchanges: Question-Response Exchange in Polemical Contexts.- Argumentativity and Informativity.- Saying and Knowing.- Dialectic, Rhetoric and Critique in Aristotle.- Toward an Anthropology of Rhetoric.- Rhetoric-Poetics-Hermeneutics.- Rhetoric and Literature.- The Figure and the Argument.- Rhetoric and Politics.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Da: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. Codice articolo ABLIING23Apr0316110332180
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. In. Codice articolo ria9789027728142_new
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germania
Buch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on. 208 pp. Englisch. Codice articolo 9789027728142
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Da: moluna, Greven, Germania
Condizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play. Codice articolo 5815597
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. pp. 208. Codice articolo 263095518
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Da: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. Print on Demand pp. 208 52:B&W 6.14 x 9.21in or 234 x 156mm (Royal 8vo) Case Laminate on White w/Gloss Lam. Codice articolo 5800961
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Da: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germania
Condizione: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 208. Codice articolo 183095508
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Da: preigu, Osnabrück, Germania
Buch. Condizione: Neu. From Metaphysics to Rhetoric | Michel Meyer | Buch | vi | Englisch | 1989 | Springer Netherland | EAN 9789027728142 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. Codice articolo 102439488
Quantità: 5 disponibili
Da: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germania
Buch. Condizione: Neu. Neuware -by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on.Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 208 pp. Englisch. Codice articolo 9789027728142
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
Buch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - by the question in its being an answer, if only in a circumstantial (i. e. inessential) manner. One indeed must question oneself in order to remember, says Plato, but the dialectic, which would be scientific, must be something else even if it remains a play of question and answer. This contradiction did not escape Aristotle: he split the scientific from the dialectic and logic from argumentation whose respective theories he was led to conceive in order to clearly define their boundaries and specificities. As for Plato, he found in the famous theory of Ideas what he sought in order to justify knowledge as that which is supposed to hold its truth only from itself. What do Ideas mean within the framework of our approach In what consists the passage from rhetoric to ontology which leads to the denaturation of argumentation When Socrates asked, for example, 'What is virtue ', he thought one could not answer such a question because the answer refers to a single proposition, a single truth, whereas the formulation of the question itself does not indicate this unicity. For any answer, another can be given and thus continuously, if necessary, until eventually one will come across an incompatibility. Now, to a question as to what X, Y, or Z is, one can answer in many ways and nothing in the question itself prohibits multiplicity. Virtue is courage, is justice, and so on. Codice articolo 9789027728142
Quantità: 1 disponibili