During the First World War, belligerents infringed on the rights and duties of neutrals, as these had been codified in international agreements. Both the Allies and the Central Powers pressured the neutrals to modify their policies in favour of one side or the other. During the four-and-a-half years the war lasted, this pressure mounted until the neutrals were left with very little room to manoeuvre. More than fifty years ago, Nils Ørvik stated that this disregard for international law, combined with the relative weakness of the European neutrals, spelled the end of traditional political neutrality. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality. The contributors cover not only several countries involved, but also multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. They reassess the notion of neutrality and the role of neutrals during the First World War, making this collection of great value to all scholars of neutrality, the history of individual neutral countries and of the war itself.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Johan den Hertog is a postdoctoral researcher at Leiden University. Samuël Kruizinga is a doctoral student at the University of Amsterdam and a research fellow at the National Maritime Museum, Amsterdam.
De positie van neutrale landen in de Eerste Wereldoorlog.
Tijdens de Eerste Wereldoorlog maakten de oorlogvoerende landen inbreuk op de rechten en plichten van neutrale landen, zoals deze waren vastgelegd in internationale verdragen. Zowel de Geallieerden als de centrale mogendheden zetten de neutralen onder druk om hun beleid te wijzigen en hen te steunen. Tijdens de vier-en-een half jaar durende oorlog bouwde deze druk zich op tot het punt dat de neutrale landen nog maar weinig ruimte hadden om te manoeuvreren.
Meer dan vijftig jaar geleden, verklaarde Nils Ørvik dat deze minachting voor het internationaal recht, in combinatie met de relatieve zwakte van de Europese neutralen, het einde van de traditionele politieke neutraliteit betekende. In 'Caught in the Middle' wordt deze stelling opnieuw bekeken op basis van nieuw onderzoek uit Scandinavië, Nederland, Spanje en de VS. Het resultaat is de eerste vergelijkende studie in het Engels over neutraliteit in de Eerste Wereldoorlog.
- Johan den Hertog is postdoctoraal onderzoeker aan de Universiteit van Leiden.
- Samuël Kruizinga is doctoraal student aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam en onderzoeker bij het Nationaal Maritiem Museum in Amsterdam.
During the First World War, belligerents infringed on the rights and duties of neutrals, as these had been codified in international agreements. Both the Allies and the Central Powers pressured the neutrals to modify their policies to favour them over their adversaries. During the four-and-a-half years the war lasted, this pressure mounted until the neutrals were left with very little room to manoeuvre.More than fifty years ago, Nils Ørvik stated that this disregard for international law, combined with the relative weakness of the European neutrals, spelled the end of traditional political neutrality. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality.The contributors cover not only several countries involved, but also multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. They reassess the notion of neutrality and the role of neutrals during the First World War, making this collection of great value to all scholars of both neutrality, the history of individual neutral countries, and of the war itself.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Da: Midtown Scholar Bookstore, Harrisburg, PA, U.S.A.
paperback. Condizione: Good. Good - Bumped and creased book with tears to the extremities, but not affecting the text block, may have remainder mark or previous owner's name - GOOD PAPERBACK Standard-sized. Codice articolo M9052603707Z3
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. During the First World War, belligerents infringed on the rights and duties of neutrals, as these had been codified in international agreements. Both the Allies and the Central Powers pressured the neutrals to modify their policies to favour them over their adversaries. During the four-and-a-half years the war lasted, this pressure mounted until the neutrals were left with very little room to manoeuvre.More than fifty years ago, Nils Orvik stated that this disregard for international law, combined with the relative weakness of the European neutrals, spelled the end of traditional political neutrality. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality.The contributors cover not only several countries involved, but also multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. They reassess the notion of neutrality and the role of neutrals during the First World War, making this collection of great value to all scholars of both neutrality, the history of individual neutral countries, and of the war itself. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality. The contributors also cover multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability. Codice articolo 9789052603704
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. pp. vii + 175 Illus. Codice articolo 5758074
Quantità: 3 disponibili
Da: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Regno Unito
Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. illustrated edition. 192 pages. 9.40x6.70x0.50 inches. In Stock. Codice articolo __9052603707
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Books Puddle, Woodside, NY, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. pp. vii + 175. Codice articolo 262122661
Quantità: 3 disponibili
Da: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germania
Condizione: New. pp. vii + 175. Codice articolo 182122671
Quantità: 3 disponibili
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Neuware - During the First World War, belligerents infringed on the rights and duties of neutrals, as these had been codified in international agreements. Both the Allies and the Central Powers pressured the neutrals to modify their policies to favour them over their adversaries. During the four-and-a-half years the war lasted, this pressure mounted until the neutrals were left with very little room to manoeuvre.More than fifty years ago, Nils Ørvik stated that this disregard for international law, combined with the relative weakness of the European neutrals, spelled the end of traditional political neutrality. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality.The contributors cover not only several countries involved, but also multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. They reassess the notion of neutrality and the role of neutrals during the First World War, making this collection of great value to all scholars of both neutrality, the history of individual neutral countries, and of the war itself. Codice articolo 9789052603704
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: AussieBookSeller, Truganina, VIC, Australia
Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. During the First World War, belligerents infringed on the rights and duties of neutrals, as these had been codified in international agreements. Both the Allies and the Central Powers pressured the neutrals to modify their policies to favour them over their adversaries. During the four-and-a-half years the war lasted, this pressure mounted until the neutrals were left with very little room to manoeuvre.More than fifty years ago, Nils Orvik stated that this disregard for international law, combined with the relative weakness of the European neutrals, spelled the end of traditional political neutrality. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality.The contributors cover not only several countries involved, but also multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. They reassess the notion of neutrality and the role of neutrals during the First World War, making this collection of great value to all scholars of both neutrality, the history of individual neutral countries, and of the war itself. Caught in the Middle discusses this thesis based on new research from Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Spain and the USA. The result is the first comparative study in English on First World War neutrality. The contributors also cover multiple aspects of the concept of neutrality: political, economic, cultural and legal. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability. Codice articolo 9789052603704
Quantità: 1 disponibili