At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme - the importance of difference?
To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack - it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.
The result? An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we? Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity?
Le informazioni nella sezione "Riassunto" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Abbreviations. Introduction ― Talking ‘bout My Generation. I: LOOKING FOR DIFFERENCE. 1: Levinas, Multiculturalism and Us. 1. The Political Approach and Its Implicit Metaphysics. 2. The Ethical Approach and Its Explicit Metaphysics. 3. A Question of Attachments. 2: In Respectful Contempt. Heidegger, Appropriation, Facticity. 1. In the Margins of Thought. 2. Relativism, Scepticism, Historicism. 3. Appropriating Heidegger After Foucault. 4. Being Held (Up). 5. Just How Naked Is Dasein’s ‘That’? 3: Whistling in the Dark. Two Approaches to Anxiety. 1. Anxiety and Fear. 2. Heidegger’s Approach to Anxiety. 3. The ‘Security Paradox’. 4. Anxiety in a Pluralistic Society. II: AFTER LEVINAS. 4: The Price of Being Dispossessed. Levinas’ God and Freud’s Trauma. 1. A Discomfort That Liberates? 2. The Proximity of the Other. 3. Responsibility Is Misplaced. 4. Affects Without Context. 5. A Shock Without Affect. 6. Ex Nihilo, an Other Scene. 5: The Mortality of the Transcendent. Levinas and Evil. 1. Transcendence and Exteriority. 2. Two Paths in Metaphysics: From God to the Face and From the Face to God. 3. An Invitation or a Command? 4. A Passio in Distans. 6: Is Ethics Fundamental? Questioning Levinas on Irresponsibility. 1. Some Technicalities: The Privative Negation. 2. Levinas’ Ambivalence Toward Privation. 3. Responsibility, in a Very Small Nutshell. 4. The Face ― Not an Obstacle, but the Secret Aimof My Desire. 5. A Naturalization of the Other? 6. A Confusion ofTongues? 7. Not Leaving Oneself. 8. Beyond 'Help' ― The Logic of Appreciation. 9. 'Not Without' Qualities ― Racism Reconsidered. III: AFTER HEIDEGGER. 7. Intransitive facticity? A Question to Heidegger. 1. Untranslatably My Own. 2. Undoing Dasein’s Self-Defence. 3. Talking Oneself Out of ’It’. 4. The World ― A First Liberation. 5. The Message of Boredom. 6. Does Boredom Truly Have a Message? 7. Between the Tines of a Fork. 8. Intransitive Facticity, the Pre-History of ‘The Primacy of Ethics’. 8: Demons and the Demonic. Kierkegaard and Heidegger on Anxiety and Sexual Difference. 1. Being Unable to Die. 2. Silence, Fear and Trembling. 3. Not Nothing ― Anxiety and Pudency. 4. Adam’s ‘Passing Into the Act’. 5. A Mute Transcendence. 9: Dissensus Communis. How to Keep Silent 'After' Lyotard. 1. The Fissure. 2. A Conceptual Shift. 3. Sorrow or Care ― 'After' the 'Death' of 'God'. Conclusion ― In Search of Visibility. Acknowledgements.
Le informazioni nella sezione "Su questo libro" possono far riferimento a edizioni diverse di questo titolo.
Da: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germania
Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme- the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack- it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity 324 pp. Englisch. Codice articolo 9789400789265
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Da: Lucky's Textbooks, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. Codice articolo ABLIING23Apr0412070051642
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Ria Christie Collections, Uxbridge, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. In. Codice articolo ria9789400789265_new
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Chiron Media, Wallingford, Regno Unito
Paperback. Condizione: New. Codice articolo 6666-IUK-9789400789265
Quantità: 10 disponibili
Da: moluna, Greven, Germania
Condizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme - the importance of difference?To clarify the mea. Codice articolo 11511043
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Da: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. pp. 310. Codice articolo 26357389813
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Da: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germania
Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme - the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack - it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror. The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg 324 pp. Englisch. Codice articolo 9789400789265
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - At the origin of this volume, a simple question: what to make of that surprisingly monotonous series of statements produced by our societies and our philosophers that all converge in one theme- the importance of difference To clarify the meaning of the difference at stake here, we have tried to rephrase it in terms of the two major and mutually competing paradigms provided by the history of phenomenology only to find both of them equally unable to accommodate this difference without violence. Neither the ethical nor the ontological approach can account for a subject that insists on playing a part of its own rather than following the script provided for it by either Being or the Good. What appears to be, from a Heideggerian or Levinasian perspective, an unwillingness to open up to what offers to deliver us from the condition of subjectivity is analysed in these pages as a structure in its own right. Far from being the wilful, indifferent and irresponsive being its critics have portrayed it to be, the so-called 'postmodern' subject is essentially finite, not even able to assume the transcendence to which it owes its singularity. This inability is not a lack- it points instead to a certain unthought shared by both Heidegger and Levinas which sets the terms for a discussion no longer our own. Instead of blaming Heidegger for underdeveloping 'being-with', we should rather stress that his account of mineness may be, in the light of contemporary philosophy, what stands most in need of revision. And, instead of hailing Levinas as the critic whose stress on the alterity of the Other corrects Heidegger's existential solipsism, the problems into which Levinas runs in defining that alterity call for a different diagnosis and a corresponding change in the course that phenomenology has taken since. Instead of preoccupying itself with the invisible, we should focus on the structures of visibility that protect us from its terror.The result An account of difference that is neither ontological nor ethical, but 'mè-ontological', and that can help us understand some of the problems our societies have come to face (racism, sexism, multiculturalism, pluralism). And, in the wake of this, an unexpected defence of what is at stake in postmodernism and in the question it has refused to take lightly: who are we Finally, an homage to Arendt and Lyotard who, if read through each other's lenses, give an exact articulation to the question with which our age struggles: how to think the 'human condition' once one realizes that there is an 'inhuman' side to it which, instead of being its mere negation, turns out to be that without which it would come to lose its humanity. Codice articolo 9789400789265
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Da: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Regno Unito
Condizione: New. Print on Demand pp. 310. Codice articolo 356182570
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Da: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germania
Condizione: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 310. Codice articolo 18357389823
Quantità: 4 disponibili