Cognitive Emotion Regulation Types among Graduate Students

Soheila Panahi

ISBN 10: 3659592420 / ISBN 13: 9783659592423

Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2014, 2014

Riguardo questo articolo

Neuware -Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The respondents were asked to answer questionnaire of cognitive emotion regulation components. According to the answers on self-blame, the respondents did not blame themselves for occurrence of negative events. Also with respect to catastrophysing, the respondents answered to all the items in low level. According to the respondents¿ answers on other-blame, the respondents did not blame others for what had happened to them. Based on the respondents¿ answers on rumination as a negative coping strategy, it could be observed that most of the responses were categorized at high level for all items. In terms of the items related to refocusing, reappraisal, acceptance and planning, all answers were categorized at high level for all the questions. Also, regarding putting into perspective, low responses were related to the statement of ¿all could have been much worse in low level. Moreover, the highest score is related to positive reappraisal. The findings also displayed significant differences in the cognitive emotion regulation of respondents of different faculties, age groups, races, and genders.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 56 pp. Englisch.

Codice articolo 9783659592423

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: Cognitive Emotion Regulation Types among Graduate Students
• Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Sep 2014
• Data di pubblicazione: 2014
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 3659592420
• ISBN 13: 9783659592423
• Rilegatura: Taschenbuch
• Condizione: Neu

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics. The respondents were asked to answer questionnaire of cognitive emotion regulation components. According to the answers on self-blame, the respondents did not blame themselves for occurrence of negative events. Also with respect to catastrophysing, the respondents answered to all the items in low level. According to the respondents’ answers on other-blame, the respondents did not blame others for what had happened to them. Based on the respondents’ answers on rumination as a negative coping strategy, it could be observed that most of the responses were categorized at high level for all items. In terms of the items related to refocusing, reappraisal, acceptance and planning, all answers were categorized at high level for all the questions. Also, regarding putting into perspective, low responses were related to the statement of “all could have been much worse in low level. Moreover, the highest score is related to positive reappraisal. The findings also displayed significant differences in the cognitive emotion regulation of respondents of different faculties, age groups, races, and genders.

L'autore

Author is from Iran where she worked as mental health expert in Medical Sciences University of Hamadan and graduated as Ph.D in field of Educational Psychology in faculty of educational studies at University Putra Malaysia. She has also collaborated with organization of education.