A Comparison of Two Approaches of Symbolic Modeling and Self-Efficacy. Questo articolo non è disponibile.
Lingua: inglese
Editore: Dissertation.com, 1999
- Brossura
- Usato
Da: AwesomeBooks, Wallingford, Regno UnitoAwesomeBooks
Venditore AbeBooks dal 28 novembre 2006
Condizione: Usato - Molto buono
EUR 10,34
Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore
A Comparison of Two Approaches of Symbolic Modeling and Self-Efficacy This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. .
Codice articolo 7719-9781581120745
- Titolo
- A Comparison of Two Approaches of Symbolic Modeling and Self-Efficacy
- Autore
- Hamilton Ph.D., Roy Roy Hamilton Ph.D.,
- Editore
- Dissertation.com
- Anno di pubblicazione
- 1999
- Condizione
- Very Good
- Rilegatura
- paperback
- Lingua
- inglese
- ISBN 10
- 1581120745
- ISBN 13
- 9781581120745
The effect of video and written modeling on self-efficacy of 70 master's degree students enrolled in their first techniques course was investigated. The ability to understand and use reflection of content, feeling, and meaning was presented to the experimental group through videotaped instruction and examples and the control group through written instruction and examples. Facts about reflecting skills, which included information and three vignettes, demonstrated the use of the skills. Through two pilot studies, the Reflecting Skills Questionnaire (RSQ) developed for this study showed convergent validity with the Counseling Self-Estimate Inventory (COSE). Participants' indication of self-efficacy for the reflection of content, feeling, and meaning was assessed by the RSQ. A t - test was computed to determine whether video or written treatment had an effect on the self efficacy of counselors in training. Using a two-tailed t - test for independent groups, no significant difference (p > .05) was found.
"Riassunto" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.