The Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation: Lessons from South Asia (BCSIA Studies in International Security)

Hagerty, Associate Professor of Political Science / Editor Asian Security Devin T

ISBN 10: 0262581612 / ISBN 13: 9780262581615

Editore: MIT Press, 1998

Riguardo questo articolo

Your purchase helps support Sri Lankan Children's Charity 'The Rainbow Centre'. Ex-library, so some stamps and wear, but in good overall condition. May contain underlining and/or highlighting. Our donations to The Rainbow Centre have helped provide an education and a safe haven to hundreds of children who live in appalling conditions.

Codice articolo Z1-B-027-02226

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: The Consequences of Nuclear Proliferation: Lessons from South Asia (BCSIA Studies in International Security)
• Editore: MIT Press
• Data di pubblicazione: 1998
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 0262581612
• ISBN 13: 9780262581615
• Rilegatura: Brossura
• Condizione: Good

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

Analysts of international politics have debated heatedly over the likely consequences of the spread of nuclear weapons. Most argue that nuclear proliferation will destabilize the world and increase the risk of nuclear war. Others counter that the threat of nuclear war is enough to convince new nuclear nations to adopt prudent security policies.

In this book, Devin Hagerty examines the relationship between two emerging nuclear powers—India and Pakistan—to assess how nuclear weapons have changed their foreign and military policies. Even before India and Pakistan tested nuclear weapons in 1998, both countries believed that the other was capable of assembling a bomb. In recent years, their respective governments had conducted diplomacy in the shadow of those nuclear suspicions. India and Pakistan have fought three wars since becoming independent in 1947 and their relations remain tense, especially over the disputed border region of Kashmir.

Hagerty presents detailed studies of the January 1987 Indo-Pakistani crisis, precipitated by India's "Brasstacks" military exercises, and the 1990 confrontation over Kashmir. He finds that the two countries nearly went to war in the "Brasstacks" crisis, at least partly because Pakistan's nuclear capability remained nascent. In the 1990 crisis, however, both countries were aware of the possibility of nuclear escalation and acted more cautiously. Hagerty finds little evidence of preparations for preemptive nuclear strikes in the 1990 crisis. Instead, India and Pakistan appear to have embraced the logic of nuclear deterrence. Hagerty concludes that relations between India and Pakistan in recent years support the argument that nuclear proliferation does not necessarily destabilize international relations and may even reduce the risk of war. This conclusion is grounds for optimism about peace in South Asia now that India and Pakistan are overt nuclear-weapons states.

Product Description

Analysts of international politics have engaged in heated debate over the likely consequences of the spread of nuclear weapons. Most have argued that nuclear proliferation will destabalize the world and increase the risk of nuclear war. Others counter that nuclear war is so destructive that new nuclear nations will adopt prudent security policies. In this book, Devin Hagerty examines the relationship between two emerging nuclear powers - India and Pakistan - to assess how nuclear weapons have changed their foreign and military policies. Although both countries publicly deny any desire to acquire nuclear weapons, India exploded a nuclear device in 1974 and Pakistan is widely believed to be capable of assembling a nuclear weapon. India and Pakistan have fought three wars since becoming independent in 1948 and their relations remain tense, especially over the disputed border region of Kashmir. Hagerty presents detailed studies of the January 1987 Indo-Pakistan crisis, precipitated by India's "Brasstacks" military exercises, and the 1990 confrontation over Kashmir. He concludes that relations between India and Pakistan in recent years support the argument that nuclear proliferation is not necessarily destablizing and may even reduce the risk of war.