How Consistent are Interpretations of the Principle of Proportionality in Situations of Asymmetric Conflicts?

Lingua: inglese

Editore: GRIN Verlag Feb 2017, 2017

366837760X / 9783668377608

Da: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, GermaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Venditore con 5 stelle

Venditore AbeBooks dal 11 gennaio 2012

Brossura

Condizione: Nuovo

EUR 42,95

EUR 23,00 spedizione 
Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

Quantità: 2 disponibili

Aggiungi al carrello
Resi gratuiti per 30 giorni

Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore

This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Master's Thesis from the year 2015 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 69 (Merit) - UK System, University College London (School of Public Policy), course: Human Rights, language: English, abstract: In this paper I present a holistic approach to identify how consistent interpretations of jus in bello proportionality regarding precision strikes in the context of counterinsurgency operations are by examining both consistency in substance and process. I hypothesize that there is high inconsistency in proportionality balancing, and will illustrate that it is both a theoretical and practical problem by using a mixed-methods design of empirical and theoretical analysis. Doing so, I will move beyond a positivist reading of the law to present my argument though a normative framework. I will argue that to fully comprehend this inconsistency one needs to understand the normative relationship between IHL and IHRL.Structurally, I begin the thesis with an empirical analysis of case law and of the counterinsurgency policy of the US to demonstrate (in)consistency by rethinking it in four specific categories: scope, content, time, certainty. The purpose of this section is to evidence variance in interpretations of the proportionality variables and of the balancing act in ex-post (jurisprudence) and ex-ante (policy) assessments. Secondly, I will engage in a purposive analysis of the legal framework presenting theoretical approaches on the relationship of IHL with IHRL. This is to dismiss inconsistency in proportionality balancing as a ROL problem by showing that there is a higher (normative) purpose behind it. In the final chapter, I will apply the theoretical findings to the empirical discoveries to demonstrate that inconsistency is due to a 'proportionality continuum'. This section will illustrate that inconsistency is not inherently bad as long as it serves the protective purpose intrinsic to both IHL and IHRL, which suggests changing policy rather than the law. 72 pp. Englisch.…

Codice articolo 9783668377608

Titolo
How Consistent are Interpretations of the Principle of Proportionality in Situations of Asymmetric Conflicts?
Autore
Anna Scheithauer
Editore
GRIN Verlag Feb 2017
Anno di pubblicazione
2017
Condizione
Neu
Rilegatura
Taschenbuch
Lingua
inglese
ISBN 10
366837760X
ISBN 13
9783668377608
Peso dell'articolo
118 grammi
Dimensioni
210x148x6 mm

BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Bergisch Gladbach, Germania

Venditore con 5 stelle

Venditore AbeBooks dal 11 gennaio 2012

Tariffe di spedizione da Germania a U.S.A.

ArticoloDa 5 a 15 giorni lavorativiDa 5 a 15 giorni lavorativi
Primo articoloEUR 23,00EUR 23,00
I tempi di consegna sono stabiliti dai venditori e variano in base al corriere e al paese. Gli ordini che devono attraversare una dogana possono subire ritardi e spetta agli acquirenti pagare eventuali tariffe o dazi associati. I venditori possono contattarti in merito ad addebiti aggiuntivi dovuti a eventuali maggiorazioni dei costi di spedizione dei tuoi articoli.

Metodi di pagamento

  • Visa
  • Mastercard
  • American Express
  • Carte Bleue
  • Apple Pay
  • Google Pay
  • Assegno
  • Bonifico bancario
  • PayPal

Informazioni sull’azienda del venditore

BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

Germania