The Date of the Muratorian Fragment : An Inference to the Best Explanation

John F. Lingelbach

ISBN 10: 173627399X / ISBN 13: 9781736273999

Editore: GCRR Press, 2020

Riguardo questo articolo

nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Three hundred years after its discovery, scholars find themselves unable to determine the more likely of the two hypotheses regarding the date of the Muratorian Fragment, which consists of a catalog of New Testament texts. Is the Fragment a late second- to early third-century composition or a fourth-century composition This present work seeks to break the impasse. The study found that, by making an inference to the best explanation, a second-century date for the Fragment is preferred. This methodology consists of weighing the two hypotheses against five criteria: plausibility, explanatory scope, explanatory power, credibility, and simplicity. What makes this current work unique in its contribution to church history and historical theology is that it marks the first time the rigorous application of an objective methodology, known as 'inference to the best explanation' (or IBE), has been formally applied to the problem of the Fragment's date.

Codice articolo 9781736273999

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: The Date of the Muratorian Fragment : An Inference to the Best Explanation
• Editore: GCRR Press
• Data di pubblicazione: 2020
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 173627399X
• ISBN 13: 9781736273999
• Rilegatura: Taschenbuch
• Condizione: Neu
• Dimensioni: 229 L x 152 A x 10 P (millimetri) 229 millimetri di larghezza per 152 millimetri di altezza per 10 millimetri di profondità
• Peso: 262 grammi

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

Three hundred years after its discovery, scholars find themselves unable to determine the more likely of the two hypotheses regarding the date of the Muratorian Fragment, which consists of a catalog of New Testament texts. Is the Fragment a late second- to early third-century composition or a fourth-century composition? This present work seeks to break the impasse. The study found that, by making an inference to the best explanation, a second-century date for the Fragment is preferred. This methodology consists of weighing the two hypotheses against five criteria: plausibility, explanatory scope, explanatory power, credibility, and simplicity. What makes this current work unique in its contribution to church history and historical theology is that it marks the first time the rigorous application of an objective methodology, known as "inference to the best explanation" (or IBE), has been formally applied to the problem of the Fragment's date.

Informazioni sull?autore

John F. Lingelbach holds a Ph.D. in Theology and Apologetics (Church History) from Liberty University. He is an adjunct professor of New Testament studies at Grace Christian University, and a retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel. He lives in Florida with his wife, Kimberly.