Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Questo articolo non è disponibile.
Lingua: inglese
Editore: Princeton University Press, 2007
- Brossura
- Usato

Da: World of Books (was SecondSale), Montgomery, IL, U.S.A.World of Books (was SecondSale)
Venditore AbeBooks dal 20 dicembre 2007
Condizione: Usato - Molto buono
EUR 6,09
Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore
Explains how the Senate managed to satisfy its lawmaking role during the 19th and early 20th century, when it lacked essential formal rules for governing debate. This book argues that in a system where filibusters played out as wars of attrition, the threat of rule changes prevented the institution from devolving into parliamentary chaos.
Codice articolo 00107147702
- Titolo
- Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate
- Autore
- Gregory Wawro
- Editore
- Princeton University Press
- Anno di pubblicazione
- 2007
- Condizione
- Very Good
- Rilegatura
- Paperback
- Lingua
- inglese
- ISBN 10
- 0691134065
- ISBN 13
- 9780691134062
- Serie
- Libro 41 di 67: Princeton Studies in American Politics: Historical, International, and Comparative Perspectives
Parliamentary obstruction, popularly known as the "filibuster," has been a defining feature of the U.S. Senate throughout its history. In this book, Gregory J. Wawro and Eric Schickler explain how the Senate managed to satisfy its lawmaking role during the nineteenth and early twentieth century, when it lacked seemingly essential formal rules for governing debate.
What prevented the Senate from self-destructing during this time? The authors argue that in a system where filibusters played out as wars of attrition, the threat of rule changes prevented the institution from devolving into parliamentary chaos. They show that institutional patterns of behavior induced by inherited rules did not render Senate rules immune from fundamental changes.
The authors' theoretical arguments are supported through a combination of extensive quantitative and case-study analysis, which spans a broad swath of history. They consider how changes in the larger institutional and political context--such as the expansion of the country and the move to direct election of senators--led to changes in the Senate regarding debate rules. They further investigate the impact these changes had on the functioning of the Senate. The book concludes with a discussion relating battles over obstruction in the Senate's past to recent conflicts over judicial nominations.
"Riassunto" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.
Informazioni sull’autore
"Descrizione articolo" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.