Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan (Paperback)

James J. O'Hara

ISBN 10: 0521646421 / ISBN 13: 9780521646420

Editore: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2007

Riguardo questo articolo

Paperback. How should we react as readers and as critics when two passages in a literary work contradict one another? Classicists once assumed that all inconsistencies in ancient texts needed to be amended, explained away, or lamented. Building on recent work on both Greek and Roman authors, this book explores the possibility of interpreting inconsistencies in Roman epic. After a chapter surveying Greek background material including Homer, tragedy, Plato and the Alexandrians, five chapters argue that comparative study of the literary use of inconsistencies can shed light on major problems in Catullus' Peleus and Thetis, Lucretius' De Rerum Natura, Vergil's Aeneid, Ovid's Metamorphoses, and Lucan's Bellum Civile. Not all inconsistencies can or should be interpreted thematically, but numerous details in these poems, and some ancient and modern theorists, suggest that we can be better readers if we consider how inconsistencies may be functioning in Greek and Roman texts. How should we react as readers and as critics when two passages in a literary work contradict one another? Classicists once assumed that all inconsistencies in ancient texts needed to be amended, explained away, or lamented. Building on recent work on both Greek and Roman authors, this book explores the possibility of interpreting inconsistencies in Roman epic. After a chapter surveying Greek background material including Homer, tragedy, Plato and the Alexandrians, five chapters argue that comparative study of the literary use of inconsistencies can shed light on major problems in Catullus??? Peleus and Thetis, Lucretius??? De Rerum Natura, Vergil??'s Aeneid, Ovid??'s Metamorphoses, and Lucan??'s Bellum Civile. Not all inconsistencies can or should be interpreted thematically, but numerous details in these poems, and some ancient and modern theorists, suggest that we can be better readers if we consider how inconsistencies may be functioning in Greek and Roman texts. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Codice articolo 9780521646420

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: Inconsistency in Roman Epic: Studies in Catullus, Lucretius, Vergil, Ovid and Lucan (Paperback)
• Editore: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
• Data di pubblicazione: 2007
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 0521646421
• ISBN 13: 9780521646420
• Rilegatura: Paperback
• Condizione: new

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

Explores the possibility of providing literary interpretations of inconsistencies in five Roman epics.

Informazioni sull?autore

James J. O'Hara is George L. Paddison Professor of Latin at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. He is the author of Death and the Optimistic Prophecy in Vergil's Aeneid (1990) and True Names: Vergil and the Alexandrian Tradition of Etymological Wordplay (1996), as well as numerous articles and reviews on Latin literature.