At Odds with Aids: Thinking and Talking About a Virus (Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics). Questo articolo non è disponibile.
Lingua: inglese
Editore: Stanford University Press, 1996
- Brossura
- Usato

Da: WorldofBooks, Goring-By-Sea, WS, Regno UnitoWorldofBooks
Venditore AbeBooks dal 16 marzo 2007
Condizione: Usato - Molto buono
EUR 5,93
Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore
The book has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.
Codice articolo GOR014467681
- Titolo
- At Odds with Aids: Thinking and Talking About a Virus (Meridian: Crossing Aesthetics)
- Autore
- Garca Dttmann, Alexander
- Editore
- Stanford University Press
- Anno di pubblicazione
- 1996
- Condizione
- Very Good
- Rilegatura
- Paperback
- Lingua
- inglese
- ISBN 10
- 0804724385
- ISBN 13
- 9780804724388
- Peso dell'articolo
- 358 grammi
What does it mean to oppose AIDS, to be at odds with AIDS? What kind of rupture with history does AIDS represent? How does AIDS and what is said about AIDS relate to gay identity? How does AIDS relate to thinking and acting, particularly deconstructive thinking? The author confronts these questions from a broad philosophical background that ranges from Kant, Nietzsche, Kierkegaard, and Heidegger to contemporary thought concerning gay activism and AIDS research, all brought together in an effort to find a philosophical language capable of doing justice to the singularity of lived experience in the shadow of AIDS.
In examining what AIDS reveals about the conditions of existence, García Düttmann develops the idea of the “dis-unity” or “at-odds-ness” of existence, of the “non-belonging” that characterizes the marginalized, outcast, or abandoned, and exposes human existence itself. He analyzes what AIDS reveals about the character of history through two intertwined issues. First, he examines arguments bearing on the epochal significance of AIDS, the idea that AIDS reveals something uniquely characteristic of our time, hence that the epidemic marks a historical caesura. Second, he develops a theory of historical witnessing suggesting that the phenomena of historical event and bearing witness are not at all separate, but instead are co-originary, inhering in the same complex.
"Riassunto" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.
Informazioni sull’autore
"Descrizione articolo" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.