Peace and Mind: Civilian Scholarship from Common Knowledge.

Perl, Jeffrey M. (editor)

ISBN 10: 1934542164 / ISBN 13: 9781934542163

Editore: The Davies Group, Aurora, Colorado, 2011

Riguardo questo articolo

This copy is FINE; the text is clear, bright, and unmarked; binding is tight. Apparent first edition (not noted but earliest appearance of book); stated first printing. The covers are also fine: absolutely intact in all ways, including perfect color and design. We have a five star rating because of our fulfilment success and because our descriptions are accurate. We ship all books to U.S. buyers with Tracking. We guarantee: NO NASTY SURPRISES.

Codice articolo 003483

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: Peace and Mind: Civilian Scholarship from Common Knowledge.
• Editore: The Davies Group, Aurora, Colorado
• Data di pubblicazione: 2011
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 1934542164
• ISBN 13: 9781934542163
• Rilegatura: Paperback
• Condizione: Like New

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

Addressed to veterans of the "culture wars" and their students, the essays collected here define and exemplify a genre of scholarship devoted to irenic ends and civil means. The humanities and human sciences are shown to employ concepts, strategies, and vocabularies more appropriate to martial than humanitarian pursuits. This war footing is especially inapt and regrettable in that contemporary anthropology, historiography, science studies, literary theory, sociology of knowledge, religious studies, psychology, and hermeneutics have developed a basis for more promising alternatives. Contemporary theory stipulates that opposites are mutually constituting, mutually deconstructing, and unendurably dependent, yet the theorists themselves have been embroiled in academic battles that belie the premises they defend. Clifford Geertz, Bruno Latour, Gianni Vattimo, Maya Jasanoff, Ulrich Beck, and other "civilian scholars" propose here that adversarial relationships be reconceived as dependencies (or covert agreements) and that scholarship recognize that enemies have agreed to fight rather than experience an ambivalence they share. If each party to a dispute is divided—divided as an individual—then words like "agreement," "disagreement," and "conflict" lose their usefulness in complex and subtle conversation. These sixteen case studies suggest that the terms now heard in such discussions are too primitive for use by intellectuals. Versions of all the essays in this volume appeared first in issues of the journal Common Knowledge published between 1992 and 2009. They appear together for the first time in this collection with a theoretical introduction and detailed analyses by the book's editor (who is also editor of Common Knowledge).