The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God

Phillips, D.Z.

ISBN 10: 033402966X / ISBN 13: 9780334029663

Editore: SCM Press, 2012

Riguardo questo articolo

Most items will be dispatched the same or the next working day. A copy that has been read, but is in excellent condition. Pages are intact and not marred by notes or highlighting. The spine remains undamaged.

Codice articolo wbs8111988565

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: The Problem of Evil and the Problem of God
• Editore: SCM Press
• Data di pubblicazione: 2012
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 033402966X
• ISBN 13: 9780334029663
• Rilegatura: Brossura
• Condizione: Very Good

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

By his own admission this is by far D Z Phillip’s most systematic attempt to discuss the problem of evil. Within the text the author argues that the majority of Anglo-American philosophers of religion who make a distinction between what is called the logical problem of evil and what is known as the practical, emotive or pastoral problem of evil are making false distinction. He argues that the logical is rooted in the practical. He does not intend to offer one 'correct' response to the problem of evil, but to point out the the confusions that are created by reflecting on the logical, conceptual problem in isolation. He advocates that there will always be more than one response to dealing with the problem of evil, but sees it as the job pf philosophers to point out where conceptual confusion arises.

Product Description

Within the text the author argues that the majority of Anglo-American philosophers of religion who make a distinction between what is called the logical problem of evil and what is known as the practical, emotive or pastoral problem of evil,are making false distinction. He argues that the logical is rooted in the practical. He does not intend to offer one'correct' response to the problem of evil, but to point out the the confusions that are created by reflecting on the logical, conceptual problem in isolation. He advocates that there will always be more than one response to dealing with the problem of evil, but sees it as the job pf philosophers to point out where conceptual confusion arises.