Radicalized Schools: How to Combat the Racial Radicalization of Education: A Guidebook for Parents and Policymakers!

How to Combat the Racial Radicalization of EducationVol IThis two-volume guidebook is essentially an encyclopedia illustrating the problems revolving around the racial agendathat’s indoctrinating K-12 students who are being radicalized by promoting Critical Race Theory (CRT) with all of itsvarious clones using different terms and phrases. The issue with parents who are revolting against is how it is beingdone—indoctrination and not choice, and not age appropriate in the lower grades.The reason for two volumes is because most books relating to this issue go into the topic without giving the necessarybackground—stagecraft--to really know what’s involved. Too often authors assume the reader is familiar with the backgroundinformation and that is a dangerous assumption to make. Vol, I provides the definitions of so many words and phrasesbecause Critical Race Theory is a concept driven by twisted and confusing language much of it with new words such asintersectionality making it sound mysterious and even important.Yet, it is a simple problem to resolve with choice and options; but the racial advocates, primarily white suburbaneducators, do not want it resolved believing that every single student K-12 must be radicalized and racialized by the racialagenda without providing any evidence of the need for its infusion in K-12 schooling.The districts promoting it are even denying that CRT is being promoted. Therefore, it’s the words being used that arethe clue whether or not CRT it is being taught. For example, the Superintendent of Schools of the trophy school did anunpresented action by purchasing a copy of How to be an AntiRacist for every teacher to use; no further evidence is needed.Anyone can be radicalized (it occurs when someone starts to believe or support extreme views, and then in somecases they become willing or unwilling radicalized activists. Even the Connecticut solution (a deep blue state) arrived ata very amicable solution. It recognized that it should not be done through indoctrination, but with choice and only at thehigh school level.In addition, it’s a political issue with Progressive Demo,crats and the Biden White House advocating for its use inschools, and Republicans opposed to it. For example, the term slavery is interpreted to mean black slavery only, when infact, white slavery started sooner, it was harsher because they were used in the dangerous mining and timber work, andit was cheaper to buy a white slave rather than a black slave.Vol IIVolume I set the center stage for the radicalization drama to take place for Vol II to provide the nitty-gritty of the racialagenda that creates conflict, chaos, anger and makes schools unsafe for staff and students. This is reason enough whyit does not belong in schools.What’s critical to understand is that this extreme indoctrination has absolutely nothing to do with improving academicskills and knowledge, and furthermore, it violates U.S. Supreme Court decision (1968, Epperson vs Arkansas) that “prohibitsthe teaching of only one dogma.” What’s even more interesting is that the districts promoting the racial dogma denythat they are doing so. In psychology, “denialism is a person’s choice to deny reality as a way to avoid a psychologicallyuncomfortable truth,” moreso for others when it involves the racial agenda. The options available to combat the radicalizationare then provided.To make matters far worse is that the time and attention being given to this agenda has the so-called safe schoolplans collecting dust causing the publication of, Does Your Child Attend a Safe School? No! A Manual for Parents andPolicymakers,” that provides 53 reasons why schools doing the racial agenda are not safe, Additionally, reading and mathscores have been in a steady decline with 30-35 million students scoring below proficiency; can it be any worse?