Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle

R. M. Dancy

ISBN 10: 9027711895 / ISBN 13: 9789027711892

Editore: Springer, Springer Okt 1980, 1980

Riguardo questo articolo

This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This study began as a paper. It got out of hand. It had help doing that. Oswaldo Chateaubriand, Ronald Haver, Paul Horwich, Bernie Katz, Norman Kretzmann, Stanley Martens, Stephen Pink, Michael Stokes, Eleanor Stump, Bill Ulrich, Celia Wolf, and a lot of other people questioned or criticized or helped reformulate one or another of the arguments and interpretations along the way. In spite of (maybe partly because of) their efforts, the book is full of mistakes. At least, induction over previous drafts indicates that irresistibly. But I do not, right now, know of any particular mistakes. All but a couple of the translations are mine (the exceptions are noted). That is not because existing translations are bad, but because some uniformity was essential. The translations often make unpleasant reading. So, often, does Aristotle; I have tried to be literal. A text and translation of the passage on which the book centers is in Appendix III. Footnotes cite literature by author and (sometimes abbreviated) title. Details are in the bibliography. I do not profess to have covered all the literature. An enormous amount of editorial work was done by Margaret Mundy. She was not able to undo the errors that remain. In particular, the footnotes are often numbered oddly: '4', '4a', '4b', etc.Springer-Verlag KG, Sachsenplatz 4-6, 1201 Wien 204 pp. Englisch.

Codice articolo 9789027711892

Dati bibliografici

• Titolo: Sense and Contradiction: A Study in Aristotle
• Editore: Springer, Springer Okt 1980
• Data di pubblicazione: 1980
• Lingua: Inglese
• ISBN 10: 9027711895
• ISBN 13: 9789027711892
• Rilegatura: Taschenbuch
• Condizione: Neu
• Dimensioni: 229 L x 152 A x 12 P (millimetri) 229 millimetri di larghezza per 152 millimetri di altezza per 12 millimetri di profondità
• Peso: 304 grammi

Descrizione articolo

Riassunto

This study began as a paper. It got out of hand. It had help doing that. Oswaldo Chateaubriand, Ronald Haver, Paul Horwich, Bernie Katz, Norman Kretzmann, Stanley Martens, Stephen Pink, Michael Stokes, Eleanor Stump, Bill Ulrich, Celia Wolf, and a lot of other people questioned or criticized or helped reformulate one or another of the arguments and interpretations along the way. In spite of (maybe partly because of) their efforts, the book is full of mistakes. At least, induction over previous drafts indicates that irresistibly. But I do not, right now, know of any particular mistakes. All but a couple of the translations are mine (the exceptions are noted). That is not because existing translations are bad, but because some uniformity was essential. The translations often make unpleasant reading. So, often, does Aristotle; I have tried to be literal. A text and translation of the passage on which the book centers is in Appendix III. Footnotes cite literature by author and (sometimes abbreviated) title. Details are in the bibliography. I do not profess to have covered all the literature. An enormous amount of editorial work was done by Margaret Mundy. She was not able to undo the errors that remain. In particular, the footnotes are often numbered oddly: '4', '4a', '4b', etc.

Contenuti

I / Aristotle’s Program.- I. The Unprovability of the Law of Non-Contradiction.- A. The First Consideration: the Cognitive Priority of the Law.- B. The Second Consideration: the Logical Priority of the Law.- II. Arguing ‘by Way of Refutation’.- II / The First Refutation: General Structure.- I. The Plot of the Argument.- II. On the General Strategy.- III. Where Antiphasis Might Balk.- IV. Where Antiphasis Does Balk: Two Sub-Plots.- V. Summary.- III / ON Antiphasis’ Character and Upbringing.- I. Antiphasis’ Thesis.- II. Some Sophistry.- IV / The First Refutation: The Treatment of Antiphasis.- I. On Contradiction.- II. Uttering and Signifying.- III. Signifying and Defining.- IV. Conclusion.- V / The Second Refutation.- I. On Substances, Essences, and Why We Need Them.- II. Antiphasis’ Commitments as to Essences.- VI / On Sense and Essence.- I. Subjects and Predicates; Essences and Accidents.- II. Essence and Falsehood.- III. Words and Essences.- VII / Conclusion.- Index Locorum.- (a) Plato.- (b) Aristotle.- (c) Other Ancient Authors.