The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment?Abridged Edition (Landmark Law Cases and American Society). Questo articolo non è disponibile.
12 valutazioni di Goodreads
Lingua: inglese
Editore: University Press of Kansas, 2005
Serie: Libro 12 di 86 - Landmark Law Cases and American Society
- Brossura
- Usato

Da: World of Books (was SecondSale), Montgomery, IL, U.S.A.World of Books (was SecondSale)
Venditore con 5 stelle
Venditore AbeBooks dal 20 dicembre 2007
Non disponibile
Brossura
Condizione: Usato - Molto buono
EUR 4,58
Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore
Item in very good condition! Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc.
Codice articolo 00097461926
- Titolo
- The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment?Abridged Edition (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)
- Autore
- Labbe, Ronald M.
- Editore
- University Press of Kansas
- Anno di pubblicazione
- 2005
- Condizione
- Very Good
- Rilegatura
- Brossura
- Lingua
- inglese
- ISBN 10
- 0700614095
- ISBN 13
- 9780700614097
- Edizione
- seconda edizione
- Serie
- Libro 12 di 86: Landmark Law Cases and American Society
The Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, ratified in 1868, sought to protect the rights of the newly freed slaves; but its first important test did not arise until five years later. That test centered on a vitriolic dispute among the white butchers of mid-Reconstruction New Orleans.
The rough-and-tumble world of nineteenth-century New Orleans was a sanitation nightmare, with the city's slaughterhouses dumping animal remains into local backwaters. When Louisiana authorized a monopoly slaughterhouse to bring about sanitation reform, many independent butchers felt disenfranchised. Framing their case as an infringement of rights protected by the new amendment, they flooded the lower courts with nearly 300 suits. The surviving cases that reached the U.S. Supreme Court pitted the butchers' right to labor against the state's "police power" to regulate public health. The result was a controversial decision that for the first time addressed the meaning and import of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaking for the majority in the Court's 5-4 decision, Justice Samuel F. Miller upheld the state's actions as a fair use of its "police power." He also argued that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended exclusively as a means of protecting and redressing the suffering of former slaves. The result was a very restricted interpretation of the amendment's "privileges and immunities," "due process," and "equal protection" clauses. In striking contrast, the minority, led by Justices Stephen Field and Joseph Bradley, claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment had been intended to apply to all Americans, not just former slaves, and therefore protected the butchers' right to labor in their chosen profession.
Engagingly written and concisely crafted for students and general readers, this newly abridged edition provides a very accessible guide to one of the Supreme Court's most famous cases.
The rough-and-tumble world of nineteenth-century New Orleans was a sanitation nightmare, with the city's slaughterhouses dumping animal remains into local backwaters. When Louisiana authorized a monopoly slaughterhouse to bring about sanitation reform, many independent butchers felt disenfranchised. Framing their case as an infringement of rights protected by the new amendment, they flooded the lower courts with nearly 300 suits. The surviving cases that reached the U.S. Supreme Court pitted the butchers' right to labor against the state's "police power" to regulate public health. The result was a controversial decision that for the first time addressed the meaning and import of the Fourteenth Amendment.
Speaking for the majority in the Court's 5-4 decision, Justice Samuel F. Miller upheld the state's actions as a fair use of its "police power." He also argued that the Fourteenth Amendment was intended exclusively as a means of protecting and redressing the suffering of former slaves. The result was a very restricted interpretation of the amendment's "privileges and immunities," "due process," and "equal protection" clauses. In striking contrast, the minority, led by Justices Stephen Field and Joseph Bradley, claimed that the Fourteenth Amendment had been intended to apply to all Americans, not just former slaves, and therefore protected the butchers' right to labor in their chosen profession.
Engagingly written and concisely crafted for students and general readers, this newly abridged edition provides a very accessible guide to one of the Supreme Court's most famous cases.
"Riassunto" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.
Sinossi
Book by Labbe Ronald M Lurie Jonathan
"Descrizione articolo" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.
Risultati della ricerca per The Slaughterhouse Cases: Regulation, Reconstruction, and the Fourteenth Amendment?Abridged Edition (Landmark Law Cases and American Society)
Ci sono altre 19 copie di questo libroVisualizza tutti i risultati