Writing the Incommensurable: Kierkegaard, Rossetti, and Hopkins (Literature and Philosophy). Questo articolo non è disponibile.
Lingua: inglese
Editore: Penn State University Press, 1992
- Rilegato
- Usato

Da: ThriftBooks-Dallas, Dallas, TX, U.S.A.ThriftBooks-Dallas
Venditore AbeBooks dal 2 luglio 2009
Condizione: Usato - Molto buono
EUR 6,22
Descrizione dell’articolo da parte del venditore
May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.
Codice articolo G0271008547I4N00
- Titolo
- Writing the Incommensurable: Kierkegaard, Rossetti, and Hopkins (Literature and Philosophy)
- Autore
- Mary Finn
- Editore
- Penn State University Press
- Anno di pubblicazione
- 1992
- Condizione
- Very Good
- Sovraccoperta
- No Jacket
- Rilegatura
- Hardcover
- Lingua
- inglese
- ISBN 10
- 0271008547
- ISBN 13
- 9780271008547
- Peso dell'articolo
- 1,12 libbre
An analysis of two major religiously inspired writers from a Kierkegaardian perspective. Writing the Incommensurable studies how the threat posed by the absence of an immanent God is explored in the works of Søren Kierkegaard, Christina Rossetti, and Gerard Manley Hopkins.
Mary Finn erects a theoretical framework in each chapter based on a pseudonymous work of Kierkegaard. In these pseudonymous works, Kierkegaard uses the discourses of philosophy, theology, and literature to plot the complicated path of a religious writer whose own impulse to write complicates—if it does not compromise—the religious vision she or he wants to communicate.
The book is organized according to four Kierkegaardian categories: anxiety, lyric voice, repetition, and radical choice. All four are responses to what Kierkegaard calls the incommensurable, the unnegotiable gap between subjectivity (and God) on the one hand and "actuality" on the other. This gap plagues the writer-believer while also enabling writing. In what dilemma, then, does a religious poet find herself or himself when out of the depths of personal doubt, lack of understanding, and religious inadequacy comes a literary success? Or is this dilemma avoided by paradoxically refiguring failure as a measure of success, and if so, can such a refiguring ever be fully trusted? As the notion of the subjective "self" acquires preeminence in the nineteenth century, the particularized "writing self" is the entity Kierkegaard, Hopkins, and Rossetti fight to get beyond as religious believers. The futility of such an attempt nonetheless results in a peculiar success: there is the writing itself, material evidence that the fight occurred, imbued with the pathos and beauty of all monuments erected to lost causes.
"Riassunto" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.
Sinossi
"Descrizione articolo" può appartenere a un’altra edizione di questo titolo.