Hartry h field (11 risultati)

Hardcover. Condizione: Very Good. 22×14.5cm. The book has been cleaned. There is slight scuffing on the dust jacket. There is slight foxing on the edges. There's no writing in the text, and the condition is good.

Hardcover. Condizione: Very Good. Condizione sovraccoperta: Very Good. 1st Edition. xiv,130. 324 grams. 5.75 x 8.75 x .625 inches. Dust at the top edge. Prior owner neatly wrote his name in ink on the flyleaf. Jacket shows light to mild ordinary shelfwear but remains strong and fully intact. Book shows some rubbing at the bottom corners and the tail of the spine. The spine is slightly cocked, but remains tight with sound binding. Pages are crisp and entirely unmarked. Boards straight, corners sharp. Bound in black cloth, with stamped gold lettering to the spine. If you order this from outside the United States, we will almost certainly request an additional payment to help cover the postage. Please feel welcome to message us with any questions, or a request for photographs. Every order includes tracking and is wrapped and robustly packaged with care in Tucson, AZ. ~Mesquite Booksellers.…

hardcover. Condizione: Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used textbooks may not include companion materials such as access codes, etc. May have some wear or writing/highlighting. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority.

Condizione: Good. Former library copy. Pages intact with minimal writing/highlighting. The binding may be loose and creased. Dust jackets/supplements are not included. Includes library markings. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Condizione: New. This is an ambitious investigation into paradoxes of truth and related issues, with occasional forays into notions such as vagueness, the nature of validity, and the Godel incompleteness theorems. Hartry Field presents a new approach to the paradoxes and provides a systematic and detailed account of the main competing approaches. Num Pages: 424 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: HPK; HPL. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 232 x 157 x 21. Weight in Grams: 654. . 2008. Paperback. . . . .…

cloth, dustj, 8vo xiii+130 pp. opinion ont he contrary: there is no need to postulate mathematical entities in order to study science; nearfine condition.

Condizione: New. This is an ambitious investigation into paradoxes of truth and related issues, with occasional forays into notions such as vagueness, the nature of validity, and the Godel incompleteness theorems. Hartry Field presents a new approach to the paradoxes and provides a systematic and detailed account of the main competing approaches. Num Pages: 424 pages, black & white illustrations. BIC Classification: HPK; HPL. Category: (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 232 x 157 x 21. Weight in Grams: 654. . 2008. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.…

Condizione: Good. This is an ex-library book and may have the usual library/used-book markings inside.This book has hardback covers. In good all round condition. No dust jacket. Please note the Image in this listing is a stock photo and may not match the covers of the actual item,350grams, ISBN:0631126724. …

Hardcover. Condizione: Very Good. book.

Cloth. Condizione: Collectible; Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Very Good. 1st. A sharp copy of the 1980 1st edition. Tight and Near Fine in a bright, VG+ dustjacket, with several small closed tears at the panel edges. Still though, presents very well. Octavo, 130 pgs.

Hardcover. Condizione: Fine. Near Fine. First edition. 8vo. [7], viii-xiii, [1], 1-130 pp. Brown cloth with gold lettering blocked in red on the spine. Illustrated with a few in-text diagrams. An attractive copy of Field's first book, a defense of nominalism with respect to mathematical entities. Field argues that speaking as though mathematical entities (numbers, sets, etc.) exist is useful in scientific discourse, but ultimately we should deny the existence of such entities (contra the Quine-Putnam indispensibility argument according to which we have ontological commitment to the existence of such entities because they are required by our best scientific theories). A touch of rubbing to the jacket. …