Da: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
EUR 96,67
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: New.
Condizione: New.
HRD. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
EUR 93,86
Quantità: 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: new.
Da: GreatBookPrices, Columbia, MD, U.S.A.
EUR 101,72
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.
Da: PBShop.store UK, Fairford, GLOS, Regno Unito
EUR 102,45
Quantità: 15 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloHRD. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.
Da: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Regno Unito
EUR 102,70
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloHardcover. Condizione: Brand New. 200 pages. 6.20x0.90x8.90 inches. In Stock.
Da: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Regno Unito
EUR 102,00
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: New.
Da: GreatBookPricesUK, Woodford Green, Regno Unito
EUR 103,47
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: Oxford University Press Inc, 2024
ISBN 10: 0197770088 ISBN 13: 9780197770085
Da: THE SAINT BOOKSTORE, Southport, Regno Unito
EUR 107,27
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloHardback. Condizione: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: Oxford University Press Inc, New York, 2024
ISBN 10: 0197770088 ISBN 13: 9780197770085
Da: Grand Eagle Retail, Bensenville, IL, U.S.A.
Hardcover. Condizione: new. Hardcover. Since the 1970s, federal circuit courts have designated some decisions as unpublished as a means of keeping up with an increasing number of appeals, yet still providing quality legal analysis. These unpublished opinions declare that they will only resolve the dispute in question rather than have the rulings act as binding precedent. Scholars have since focused on policy and the law-making function of circuit courts which avoids the difficult task of grappling withthe massive number of unpublished decisions. The distinction between published and unpublished rulings has created a breeding ground for disparities in power and privilege that raise serious concernsabout social justice. Nearly four out of five decisions are unpublished.Selective Publication in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: The Invisible Norm that Perpetuates Inequality presents a comprehensive examination of the theoretical and empirical implications of a key institutional practice in a highly influential set of courts. This book sheds light on the social justice consequences of not publishing all opinions by drawing on an original dataset of over 200,000 cases.Hinkle's rigorous analysis reveals how the seemingly benign institutional feature of selective publication contributes to problematic differences in the way resources and demographic features shape power and privilegein the circuit courts. This book exposes how the decision to publish or not publish an opinion plays a significant role in who gets what, when, and how in a court of law. Academics and students will find Selective Publication in the U.S. Courts of Appeals an accessible tool for understanding circuit courts as an important political institution. Those who shape and are affected by circuit rules will gain important insight about the implications of existing rules that caninform ongoing discussions regarding potential reforms. For the last fifty years, intermediate federal appellate courts have produced Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.
Da: Revaluation Books, Exeter, Regno Unito
EUR 183,69
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloHardcover. Condizione: Brand New. 200 pages. 6.20x0.90x8.90 inches. In Stock.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: Oxford University Press Okt 2024, 2024
ISBN 10: 0197770088 ISBN 13: 9780197770085
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
EUR 188,23
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloBuch. Condizione: Neu. Neuware - For the last fifty years, intermediate federal appellate courts have produced 'published' and 'unpublished' opinions at the discretion of the judge ruling on the case. When an opinion is labelled as published, it is something that all future judges in that jurisdiction must follow, but when a ruling is designated as unpublished, it only resolves the isolated dispute instead of creating a legal precedent. Selective Publication in the U.S. Courts of Appeals compares these two types of opinions to reveal and understand inequalities created by the practice of selective publication.