9781108400312 - Taming Intuition: How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability di Arceneaux, Kevin (14 risultati)

Paperback. Condizione: Fair. No Jacket. Readable copy. Pages may have considerable notes/highlighting. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

paperback. Condizione: New. Softcover. Good binding and cover. Clean, unmarked pages.

paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Taming Intuition: How Reflection Minimizes Partisan Reasoning and Promotes Democratic Accountability This book is in very good condition and will be shipped within 24 hours of ordering. The cover may have some limited signs of wear but the pages are clean, intact and the spine remains undamaged. This book has clearly been well maintained and looked after thus far. Money back guarantee if you are not satisfied. See all our books here, order more than 1 book and get discounted shipping. .

paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Shipped within 24 hours from our UK warehouse. Clean, undamaged book with no damage to pages and minimal wear to the cover. Spine still tight, in very good condition. Remember if you are not happy, you are covered by our 100% money back guarantee.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: New. In.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 247 pages. 9.50x6.50x0.50 inches. In Stock.

Condizione: New. 2017. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condizione: New. 2017. Paperback. . . . . .

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The success of democratic governance hinges on an electorate's ability to reward elected officials who act faithfully and punish those who do not. Yet there is considerable variation among voters in their ability to objectively evaluate representatives' performance. In this book the authors develop a theoretical model, the Intuitionist Model of Political Reasoning, which posits that this variation across voters is the result of individual differences in the predisposition to reflect on and to override partisan impulses. Individuals differ in partisan intuitions resulting from the strength of their attachments to parties, as well as the degree to which they are willing to engage in the cognitively taxing process of evaluating those intuitions. The balance of these forces - the strength of intuitions and the willingness to second guess one's self - determines the extent to which individuals update their assessments of political parties and elected officials in a rational manner.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. The success of democratic governance hinges on an electorate's ability to reward elected officials who act faithfully and punish those who do not. Yet there is considerable variation among voters in their ability to objectively evaluate representatives' performance. In this book the authors develop a theoretical model, the Intuitionist Model of Political Reasoning, which posits that this variation across voters is the result of individual differences in the predisposition to reflect on and to override partisan impulses. Individuals differ in partisan intuitions resulting from the strength of their attachments to parties, as well as the degree to which they are willing to engage in the cognitively taxing process of evaluating those intuitions. The balance of these forces - the strength of intuitions and the willingness to second guess one's self - determines the extent to which individuals update their assessments of political parties and elected officials in a rational manner. This book will appeal to readers interested in understanding why some voters are able to objectively update their assessments of political parties and politicians in light of credible information, while others are less capable of doing so. The arguments and evidence presented are accessible to a broad readership. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 247 pages. 9.50x6.50x0.50 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. The success of democratic governance hinges on an electorate's ability to reward elected officials who act faithfully and punish those who do not. Yet there is considerable variation among voters in their ability to objectively evaluate representatives' performance. In this book the authors develop a theoretical model, the Intuitionist Model of Political Reasoning, which posits that this variation across voters is the result of individual differences in the predisposition to reflect on and to override partisan impulses. Individuals differ in partisan intuitions resulting from the strength of their attachments to parties, as well as the degree to which they are willing to engage in the cognitively taxing process of evaluating those intuitions. The balance of these forces - the strength of intuitions and the willingness to second guess one's self - determines the extent to which individuals update their assessments of political parties and elected officials in a rational manner. This book will appeal to readers interested in understanding why some voters are able to objectively update their assessments of political parties and politicians in light of credible information, while others are less capable of doing so. The arguments and evidence presented are accessible to a broad readership. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. This book will appeal to readers interested in understanding why some voters are able to objectively update their assessments of political parties and politicians in light of credible information, while others are less capable of doing so. The arguments and.