Isbn: 9781683595991 - suffering, not power: atonement in the middle ages (23 risultati)

Condizione: like_new.

Condizione: Good. Most items will be dispatched the same or the next working day. A copy that has been read but remains in clean condition. All of the pages are intact and the cover is intact and the spine may show signs of wear. The book may have minor markings which are not specifically mentioned.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: New.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Correcting a popular view of the atonementWas Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution.In Suffering, Not Power, Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative. Sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's Cur Deus Homo. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval figures whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These individuals come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God.Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners. Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. This book challenges that common narrative. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condizione: New. Correcting a popular view of the atonementWas Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulén, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. In Suffering, Not Power, Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative. Sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's Cur Deus Homo. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval figures whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These individuals come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God. Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners. …

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Soft cover. Condizione: As New. Book condition As New. Title- Suffering, Not Power : Atonement in the Middle Ages. Author- Benjamin Wheaton. '' Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin ? Many today follow Gustrav Aulen's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulen, this was the dominent view of the church until Anselem reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution.'' Quote from back cover of this book. Extra charges may be charged to cover postage cost because of the size and weight of this book.…

Condizione: new.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condizione: New. 2022. Paperback. . . . . .

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 232 pages. 8.50x5.50x0.70 inches. In Stock.

Condizione: New. In English.

Paperback / softback. Condizione: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condizione: New. 2022. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condizione: New.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Correcting a popular view of the atonementWas Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution.In Suffering, Not Power, Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative. Sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's Cur Deus Homo. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval figures whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These individuals come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God.Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners. Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. This book challenges that common narrative. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Correcting a popular view of the atonementWas Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution.In Suffering, Not Power, Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative. Sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's Cur Deus Homo. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval figures whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These individuals come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God.Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners. Was Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulen's Christus Victor view. According to Aulen, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. This book challenges that common narrative. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.…

Paperback. Condizione: New. Correcting a popular view of the atonementWas Christ's death a victory over death or a substitution for sin? Many today follow Gustav Aulén's Christus Victor view, which portrays Christ's death as primarily a victory over the powers of evil and death. According to Aulén, this was the dominant view of the church until Anselm reframed atonement as satisfaction and the Reformers reframed it as penal substitution. In Suffering, Not Power, Benjamin Wheaton challenges this common narrative. Sacrificial and substitutionary language was common well before Anselm's Cur Deus Homo. Wheaton displays this through a careful analysis of three medieval figures whose writings on the atonement are commonly overlooked: Caesarius of Arles, Haimo of Auxerre, and Dante Alighieri. These individuals come from different times and contexts and wrote in different genres, but each spoke of Christ's death as a sacrifice of expiation and propitiation made by God to God. Let history speak for itself, read the evidence, and reconsider the church's belief in Christ's substitutionary death for sinners. …