Lingua: Inglese
Editore: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: Books Puddle, New York, NY, U.S.A.
Condizione: New. pp. 84.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: preigu, Osnabrück, Germania
EUR 43,30
Quantità: 5 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloTaschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Role of Nepalese Forest in the global context: A case of REDD | Climate change | Raghu Bir Bista | Taschenbuch | 84 S. | Englisch | 2010 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9783838328263 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: BoD - Books on Demand, In de Tarpen 42, 22848 Norderstedt, info[at]bod[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Aug 2010, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, Germania
EUR 49,00
Quantità: 2 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloTaschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -This book deals climate change in which REDD is This study is designed to examine empirically whether REDD will be a better alternative to community forest management. This study is based on case study of Kafle Community Forest in Nepal. This study finds that the forest contributes 45 percent livelihood income to the stakeholders. REDD can give carbon income potentials annually Rs 3.9 million if KCF enters in REDD. Estimates shows 41 times higher than the forest annual income Rs 24, 549.55. Households are familiarity with REDD. The study finds only 44 percent households expecting that REDD will be a better livelihood alternative to the poor. 63 percent responds need and use of carbon income for livelihood objectives. From estimation, household stakeholders who have good asset holdings (land and livestock) think that REDD will be not a better livelihood alternative to the poor. However, the household stakeholders who have literacy, different food sufficiency level, land holding (1), different earning per day, sex, per day earning and age think that REDD will be a better alternative. Poor households consider REDD as an opportunity to improve livelihood. 84 pp. Englisch.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: Majestic Books, Hounslow, Regno Unito
EUR 78,82
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: New. Print on Demand pp. 84 2:B&W 6 x 9 in or 229 x 152 mm Perfect Bound on Creme w/Gloss Lam.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: VDM Verlag Dr. Mueller Aktiengesellschaft & Co. KG, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: Biblios, Frankfurt am main, HESSE, Germania
EUR 78,84
Quantità: 4 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 84.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: moluna, Greven, Germania
EUR 41,05
Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloCondizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Autor/Autorin: Bista Raghu BirRaghu Bir Bista is a Lecturer of Economics at Tribhuvan University, Nepal. MPhil in Economics, Jadavpur University, India was awarded to him. His research work on Case of REDD in Nepal. He wrote Foreign Direct Investme.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Aug 2010, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germania
EUR 49,00
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloTaschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -This book deals climate change in which REDD is This study is designed to examine empirically whether REDD will be a better alternative to community forest management. This study is based on case study of Kafle Community Forest in Nepal. This study finds that the forest contributes 45 percent livelihood income to the stakeholders. REDD can give carbon income potentials annually Rs 3.9 million if KCF enters in REDD. Estimates shows 41 times higher than the forest annual income Rs 24, 549.55. Households are familiarity with REDD. The study finds only 44 percent households expecting that REDD will be a better livelihood alternative to the poor. 63 percent responds need and use of carbon income for livelihood objectives. From estimation, household stakeholders who have good asset holdings (land and livestock) think that REDD will be not a better livelihood alternative to the poor. However, the household stakeholders who have literacy, different food sufficiency level, land holding (1>), different earning per day, sex, per day earning and age think that REDD will be a better alternative. Poor households consider REDD as an opportunity to improve livelihood.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 84 pp. Englisch.
Lingua: Inglese
Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010
ISBN 10: 3838328264 ISBN 13: 9783838328263
Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, Germania
EUR 49,00
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloTaschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - This book deals climate change in which REDD is This study is designed to examine empirically whether REDD will be a better alternative to community forest management. This study is based on case study of Kafle Community Forest in Nepal. This study finds that the forest contributes 45 percent livelihood income to the stakeholders. REDD can give carbon income potentials annually Rs 3.9 million if KCF enters in REDD. Estimates shows 41 times higher than the forest annual income Rs 24, 549.55. Households are familiarity with REDD. The study finds only 44 percent households expecting that REDD will be a better livelihood alternative to the poor. 63 percent responds need and use of carbon income for livelihood objectives. From estimation, household stakeholders who have good asset holdings (land and livestock) think that REDD will be not a better livelihood alternative to the poor. However, the household stakeholders who have literacy, different food sufficiency level, land holding (1), different earning per day, sex, per day earning and age think that REDD will be a better alternative. Poor households consider REDD as an opportunity to improve livelihood.