Isbn: 9783838382852 - communicable disease control in the new millenium: a qualitative inquiry on the legitimate use of restrictive measures in an era of rights consciousness (5 risultati)

Perfeziona la tua ricerca

  • Libri (5)

  • Nuovo (5)

a

Fascia di prezzo personalizzata (EUR)

a

    • Lingua: Inglese

      Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2010

      3838382854 / 9783838382852

      • Brossura

      Da: moluna, Greven, Germaniamoluna

      Venditore con 5 stelle
      Contatta il venditore

      Condizione: Nuovo

      EUR 63,42

      EUR 48,99 spedizione 
      Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

      Quantità: Più di 20 disponibili

      Condizione: New.

    • Lingua: Inglese

      Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011

      3838382854 / 9783838382852

      • Brossura

      Da: preigu, Osnabrück, Germaniapreigu

      Venditore con 5 stelle
      Contatta il venditore

      Condizione: Nuovo

      EUR 66,50

      EUR 70,00 spedizione 
      Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

      Quantità: 5 disponibili

      Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Communicable Disease Control in the New Millenium | A qualitative inquiry on the legitimate use of restrictive measures in an era of rights consciousness | Cécile M. Bensimon | Taschenbuch | 264 S. | Englisch | 2011 | LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing | EAN 9783838382852 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu.

    • Lingua: Inglese

      Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Jul 2010, 2010

      3838382854 / 9783838382852

      • Brossura
      • Print on Demand

      Da: BuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K., Bergisch Gladbach, GermaniaBuchWeltWeit Ludwig Meier e.K.

      Venditore con 5 stelle
      Contatta il venditore

      Condizione: Nuovo

      EUR 79,00

      EUR 23,00 spedizione 
      Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

      Quantità: 2 disponibili

      Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The issuance of thousands of quarantine orders duringthe SARS outbreak raised difficult questions aboutthe legitimacy of using restrictive measures in democratic societies. This inquirycombines empirical research with conceptualscholarship to establish foundational justificatorypower for restrictive interventions, which thedominant utilitarian justification lacks. It isargued that, to respect rights, while being committedto the common good, we must move beyond thesee-sawing between ostensibly competing requirementstoward a conception that gives equal weight to public health and human rights; that is, one where bothimperatives the community and the individual refer to one another without dissolving into theother based on their intersubjective recognition.Following a Habermasian account of opening processesof decision-making to a moral-practical discourse, itis further argued that public health ethics offers animportant site for integrating his model of discourse ethics within public health deliberations to expand the scope of moral argumentation on-and ultimately to ground the justification of--the use of restrictive measures. 264 pp. Englisch.

    • Lingua: Inglese

      Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing Jul 2010, 2010

      3838382854 / 9783838382852

      • Brossura
      • Print on Demand

      Da: buchversandmimpf2000, Emtmannsberg, BAYE, Germaniabuchversandmimpf2000

      Venditore con 5 stelle
      Contatta il venditore

      Condizione: Nuovo

      EUR 79,00

      EUR 60,00 spedizione 
      Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

      Quantità: 1 disponibili

      Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -The issuance of thousands of quarantine orders duringthe SARS outbreak raised difficult questions aboutthe legitimacy of using restrictive measures in democratic societies. This inquirycombines empirical research with conceptualscholarship to establish foundational justificatorypower for restrictive interventions, which thedominant utilitarian justification lacks. It isargued that, to respect rights, while being committedto the common good, we must move beyond thesee-sawing between ostensibly competing requirementstoward a conception that gives equal weight to public health and human rights; that is, one where bothimperatives - the community and the individual -refer to one another without dissolving into theother based on their intersubjective recognition.Following a Habermasian account of opening processesof decision-making to a moral-practical discourse, itis further argued that public health ethics offers animportant site for integrating his model of discourse ethics within public health deliberations to expand the scope of moral argumentation on-and ultimately to ground the justification of--the use of restrictive measures.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 264 pp. Englisch.

    • Lingua: Inglese

      Editore: LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing, 2011

      3838382854 / 9783838382852

      • Brossura
      • Print on Demand

      Da: AHA-BUCH GmbH, Einbeck, GermaniaAHA-BUCH GmbH

      Venditore con 5 stelle
      Contatta il venditore

      Condizione: Nuovo

      EUR 111,91

      EUR 30,50 spedizione 
      Spedito da Germania a U.S.A.

      Quantità: 1 disponibili

      Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - The issuance of thousands of quarantine orders duringthe SARS outbreak raised difficult questions aboutthe legitimacy of using restrictive measures in democratic societies. This inquirycombines empirical research with conceptualscholarship to establish foundational justificatorypower for restrictive interventions, which thedominant utilitarian justification lacks. It isargued that, to respect rights, while being committedto the common good, we must move beyond thesee-sawing between ostensibly competing requirementstoward a conception that gives equal weight to public health and human rights; that is, one where bothimperatives the community and the individual refer to one another without dissolving into theother based on their intersubjective recognition.Following a Habermasian account of opening processesof decision-making to a moral-practical discourse, itis further argued that public health ethics offers animportant site for integrating his model of discourse ethics within public health deliberations to expand the scope of moral argumentation on-and ultimately to ground the justification of--the use of restrictive measures.