ISBN: 9786132075291 - social work knowledge building: international federation of social workers, clinical supervision, qualitative research (4 risultati)

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware 72 pp. Englisch.

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. nach der Bestellung gedruckt Neuware - Printed after ordering - Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. The impetus forboth movements was the glaring reality of social problems and thequestion over how to best attack them. This debate is arguably theearliest example of a larger debate within social work - how isknowledge acquired This debate pits positivism against post-positivismin the pursuit of achieving respect as a profession. The positivisticargument asserts knowledge has to be observable and testable(quantitative), free from bias, and ultimately replicable if it is tohave any merit. Post-positivists argue there is no way to completelyeliminate bias, and knowledge can be obtained via qualitative researchmethods. The debate reached its greatest intensity in the 1980sreflecting the debate within the larger world of the social sciences.…

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Social Work Knowledge Building | International Federation of Social Workers, Clinical Supervision, Qualitative Research | Lambert M. Surhone (u. a.) | Taschenbuch | Englisch | 2026 | OmniScriptum | EAN 9786132075291 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: preigu GmbH & Co. KG, Lengericher Landstr. 19, 49078 Osnabrück, mail[at]preigu[dot]de | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Please note that the content of this book primarily consists of articlesavailable from Wikipedia or other free sources online. The impetus forboth movements was the glaring reality of social problems and thequestion over how to best attack them. This debate is arguably theearliest example of a larger debate within social work - how isknowledge acquired This debate pits positivism against post-positivismin the pursuit of achieving respect as a profession. The positivisticargument asserts knowledge has to be observable and testable(quantitative), free from bias, and ultimately replicable if it is tohave any merit. Post-positivists argue there is no way to completelyeliminate bias, and knowledge can be obtained via qualitative researchmethods. The debate reached its greatest intensity in the 1980sreflecting the debate within the larger world of the social sciences.VDM Verlag, Dudweiler Landstraße 99, 66123 Saarbrücken 72 pp. Englisch.…