A Brief History of the Pacifick Campaign in Flanders Anno 1712. And of the fatal cessation of arms. Shewing the traiterous steps then taken; with plain proof, that the British General did regulate his conduct according to the instructions he received from the General of France. By an Officer in the Army. The second edition.. Questo articolo non è disponibile.A Brief History of the Pacifick Campaign in Flanders Anno 1712. And of the fatal cessation of arms. Shewing the traiterous steps then taken; with plain proof, that the British General did regulate his conduct according to the instructions he received from the General of France. By an Officer in the Army. The second edition.

[2], 40pp. 8vo. Outer pages a little dusted, without half-title. Disbound. From the library of Michael Foot. ESTC T56867. Sometimes attributed to Daniel Defoe (Moore, Novak), but disputed by Furbank and Owens, Defoe De-Attributions, 319. 'A wholesale attack on the business of the secret 'restraining orders' given to Ormonde during the campaign of 1712, and on the double-dealing of the British with their Allies. It refers to Stanhope's declaration that he could bring documentary evidence to prove British complicity with the French - a fact which seems to date this tract to March 1715. It argues that this proof is all that is lacking to support a charge of high treason against the Tory leaders. The uncompromising severity against the late Harley administration argues against Defoe's authorship.'.