Editore: Printed for L. Meredith, at the Star in St. Paul's Church-Yard, London, 1698
Da: Black's Fine Books & Manuscripts, Toronto, ON, Canada
EUR 447,57
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrelloLeather Bound. Condizione: Very Good. pp. [11], 192. 12mo. Full calf over boards; four raised bands to spine, five compartments. Newer endpapers. Engraved head-pieces. Light rubbing to the leather extremities, superficial surface cracks to the leather on the spine (unaffecting the binding, which remains tight, sound). The leather exterior has recently been professionally replenished, and treated with a natural leather preserver. Period ink name to the ffep and top margin of the title page, extensive period inscription, though in neat and quite lovely penmanship to the rear endpapers; the text-block itself remains clean, and unmarked. Scarce, with only one extant copy in commerce at time of catalogunig. A handsome, and remarkably well preserved presentation; very good. See, ESTC Citation No. R25278 | 006091819. Newly reprinted with additions, being the Fourth Impression.
Editore: Cheltenham; 11 February, 1850
Da: Richard M. Ford Ltd, London, Regno Unito
Manoscritto / Collezionismo cartaceo
EUR 143,21
Quantità: 1 disponibili
Aggiungi al carrello2pp., 4to. In good condition, on aged paper, with traces of mount at head. The Earl and his brother loathed one another. FitzHardinge was a notorious philanderer, and Berkeley - whose violent behaviour included assaulting the bookseller Fraser and duelling with Maginn - held his position as a Member of Parliament to spite him. The letter begins: 'Sir. | You have published a letter from Mr. Grantley Berkeley in your Paper, a short time since, in which he asserts his knowledge of the quarter whence arises a vindictive persecution, and whence come funds for the support of an action for seduction, and in a comment, you distinctly apply this insinuation to me, and ascribe to me an interference hardly fraternal. The correspondence which I now enclose [not present] (the only communication I have ever held) will enable you to judge of the truth of the insinuation in Mr. Berkeley's letters, and as the action has dropped for want of a small sum for fees, no prejudice to a question before a Court of Law can now attend the publication of Matilda letters, and I feel it due to myself to make known the motives and extent of my interference in the matter, after the misrepresentation in your Paper.'.