finck james w (30 risultati)

paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Connecting readers with great books since 1972! Used books may not include companion materials, and may have some shelf wear or limited writing. We ship orders daily and Customer Service is our top priority!

Condizione: Very Good. Pages intact with possible writing/highlighting. Binding strong with minor wear. Dust jackets/supplements may not be included. Stock photo provided. Product includes identifying sticker. Better World Books: Buy Books. Do Good.

Paper Back. Condizione: Good.

Hardcover. Condizione: Near Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Near Fine. 1st Edition. 8vo. 243 pages, indnexed. Hardcover with a brown dust jacket. Light wear to the jacket. The book is sound and clean.

Cloth. Condizione: Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Fine. 1st Edition. This work is an in-depth study of the twelve months that decided Kentucky's fate (November 1860 to November 1861), in the Civil War. In May 1861 the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality because of its equally divided loyalties. The book contains photographs, illustrations, footnotes, tables, appendix, a bibliography, and an index. This copy is clean and solid.

Hardcover. Condizione: Fine. First Edition. (18)243pp. Biblio. Index. Photos. Maps. Short bio & portrait of the author in the rear. Size: 8vo - over 7¾ - 9¾" Tall.

Hardcover. Condizione: Very good. Hardcover. xviii, 236pp+ index. Very good hardback in a very good dustjacket.

Condizione: New.

Hardcover. Condizione: new. Hardcover. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose. Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike. AUTHOR: James Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He taught history at the University of Texas, and currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. SELLING POINTS: An in-depth study of the twelve months from November 1860 to November 1861 that decided Kentucky's fate ILLUSTRATIONS: 12 b/w photographs & 3 maps In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Hardcover. Condizione: Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Fine. Bright & newlooking in glossy jacket. With many contemporary photos.

Hardcover. Condizione: New. Condizione sovraccoperta: New. 1st Edition.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Hardcover. Condizione: New. *Brand new* Ships from USA.

Hardcover. Condizione: Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Fine. First printing. Fine in a fine dust jacket.

Hardback. Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose.Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike.About the AuthorJames Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He received his undergraduate degree in history at the College of William and Mary, a master's degree at Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Finck taught history at the University of Texas-Pan American. He currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He lives in Oklahoma with his wife and three young children.

American, History, Military, Condizione: New. Condizione sovraccoperta: history military american. . . . . 8vo, hardcover. NEW in dust jacket. No wear inside or out: crisp, clean - pristine. 243 pp., illus.

Hardback. Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose.Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike.About the AuthorJames Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He received his undergraduate degree in history at the College of William and Mary, a master's degree at Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Finck taught history at the University of Texas-Pan American. He currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He lives in Oklahoma with his wife and three young children.

Condizione: New. 2012. Paperback. . . . . .

Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Num Pages: 216 pages, 12 b/w photos throughout and 3 maps. BIC Classification: 1KBBSK; 3JH; HBJK; HBLL; HBWJ. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 236 x 153 x 19. Weight in Grams: 514. . 2013. hardcover. . . . .

Condizione: New. 2012. Paperback. . . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Num Pages: 216 pages, 12 b/w photos throughout and 3 maps. BIC Classification: 1KBBSK; 3JH; HBJK; HBLL; HBWJ. Category: (G) General (US: Trade). Dimension: 236 x 153 x 19. Weight in Grams: 514. . 2013. hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condizione: Brand New. 264 pages. 9.25x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 128 pages. 9.10x6.40x0.20 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Condizione: new. Hardcover. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose. Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike. AUTHOR: James Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He taught history at the University of Texas, and currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. SELLING POINTS: An in-depth study of the twelve months from November 1860 to November 1861 that decided Kentucky's fate ILLUSTRATIONS: 12 b/w photographs & 3 maps In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.

Hardback. Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose.Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike.About the AuthorJames Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He received his undergraduate degree in history at the College of William and Mary, a master's degree at Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Finck taught history at the University of Texas-Pan American. He currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He lives in Oklahoma with his wife and three young children.

Condizione: New.

Gebunden. Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later.&Uumlber den AutorJames Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.

Hardback. Condizione: New. In May 1861, the Kentucky state legislature passed an ordinance declaring its neutrality, which Governor Beriah Magoffin confirmed four days later. Kentucky's declaration and ultimate support for the Union stood at odds with the state's social and cultural heritage; after all, Kentucky was a slave state and enjoyed deep and meaningful connections to the new Confederacy. Much of what has been written to explain this curious choice concludes Kentucky harboured strong Unionist feelings, but here in Divided Loyalties: Kentucky's Struggle for Armed Neutrality in the Civil War, James Finck persuasively argues that the Commonwealth did not support neutrality out of its deep Unionist's sentiment. In fact, it was Kentucky's equally divided loyalties that brought about its decision to remain neutral. Both Unionists and Secessionists would come to support neutrality at different times when they felt their side would lose.Along the way, Dr. Finck examines the roles of the state legislature, the governor, other leading Kentuckians, and average citizens to understand how Kentuckians felt about the prospects of war and secession, and how bloodshed could be avoided. The finely styled prose is built upon a foundation of primary sources including letters, journals, newspapers, government documents and published reports. By focusing exclusively on one state, one issue, and one year, Divided Loyalties provides a level of detail that will deeply interest both Kentuckians and Civil War enthusiasts alike.About the AuthorJames Finck was raised in Virginia where he developed a love of the Civil War. He received his undergraduate degree in history at the College of William and Mary, a master's degree at Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. at the University of Arkansas. Dr. Finck taught history at the University of Texas-Pan American. He currently teaches American history at the University of Science and Arts of Oklahoma. He lives in Oklahoma with his wife and three young children.

4pp., 12mo. On bifolium of grey paper. In fair condition, lightly aged and worn. 53 signatures over four pages, written after the following: 'April 1939 | Dear Herman: Keep up your Heart & Get well soon. We need your kingly, cheery presence'. One signatory has written a bar of music, another has drawn a face, another has written after his name 'now then up beat!' The first signature is that of the Punch cartoonist Bert Thomas (1883-1966), after which he has written '(BLIMEY)'. Among the other signatories are the theatre critic James Agate (1877-1947), the artists C. R. W. Nevinson (1889-1946) and Aubrey Hammond (1894-1940), the script writer and comic novelist Reginald Arkell (1882-1959), the composers Thomas Case Sterndale Bennett (1882-1944), John Ansell (1874-1948) and Hamilton Crawford (c.1859-1947), the conductor Basil Cameron (1884-1875), the illustrator Percy V. Bradshaw (1877-1965), the author R. L. Megroz (1891-1968) the surgeon C. Jennings Marshall (1890-1954), the comic playwright and novelist Harris Deans (b.1886). Among the other signatures, are the following, which appear to read: Guy Church, Joe Harker, Joseph Tarkington, William Pollock, Edward Michael, Hampton Gull, T. C. Watson, Leslie H. Heward, Greville Irwin, Tom Clare, Stanley Woodwark, Gordon Beckles, Andrew Harris, Andy Hands, Charles Clegham, H. I. Whicham, C. E. Lawrence, Albert Fot, W. H. Brent, Howard Carr, Herbert Horgan, Andrew Clayton, Tommy Best, Stanford Reed. An extremely popular figure in London theatrical and musical circles, Finck was the musical director of the Palace Theatre in Shaftesbury Avenue. His 'In the Shadows' was one of the last tunes played as RMS Titanic went down.