galison peter david stump (32 risultati)

Soft cover. Condizione: Good. No Jacket. Good condition soft cover book. Shelf wear and creasing to covers and spine. Light smudging to pages, mainly bottom edge of text block. All books are individually inspected and described. Never X-Library unless specifically described as such.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condizione: New.

Paperback. Condizione: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.

1st edn. 8vo. Original silver lettered black cloth (boards lightly bowed - otherwise VG), dustwrapper (VG in protective cover). Pp. xiv + 567 (no inscriptions).

Soft cover. Condizione: Very Good. Clean, tight, unmarked; absolute minimal wear; spine straight and uncreased; Is science unified or disunified? Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity. Many of the varied aspects of debate over the disunity of science are reflected in the 16 papers in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studing science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 1st edition. 584 pages. 9.00x6.25x1.25 inches. In Stock.

Hardcover. Condizione: Very Good. Series: Writing Science. xiv 567p hardback, grey/purple dustjacket, a fresh copy, very good, no traces of use Language: English.

Stanford University Press, Stanford 1996. xiv, 567 pp. Paperback. Good condition.

Paperback. Condizione: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.

Hardcover. Condizione: Near Fine. Condizione sovraccoperta: Near Fine. 1st Edition. First printing. 8vo. 567 pp. Black cloth. Near Fine in Near Fine dust jacket. Slight shelfwear to boards. Crease to jacket's rear flap.

Condizione: New. Here, sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation.&Uumlber den AutorrnrnPeter Galison is Mallinckrodt Professor of the History of.

Hardback. Condizione: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.

Condizione: New.

HRD. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Condizione: new.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condizione: New. pp. 584.

Hardback. Condizione: New. New copy - Usually dispatched within 4 working days.

Condizione: New. pp. 584.

Condizione: As New. Unread book in perfect condition.

Condizione: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation. Editor(s): Galison, Peter; Stump, David J. Series: Writing Science. Num Pages: 584 pages, 16 half-tones, notes, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 236 x 158 x 39. Weight in Grams: 966. . 1996. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . .

Hardback. Condizione: New. Is science unified or disunified? Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge? What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science? Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge? What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid? Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.

Condizione: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation.&Uumlber den AutorrnrnPeter Galison is Mallinckrodt Professor of the History of Scien.

Condizione: New. Sixteen prominent scientists examine whether the sciences are, or ever were, unified by a single theoretical view of nature or a methodological foundation. Editor(s): Galison, Peter; Stump, David J. Series: Writing Science. Num Pages: 584 pages, 16 half-tones, notes, bibliography, index. BIC Classification: PDA. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational; (UP) Postgraduate, Research & Scholarly; (UU) Undergraduate. Dimension: 236 x 158 x 39. Weight in Grams: 966. . 1996. 1st Edition. Hardcover. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Hardcover. Condizione: Brand New. 1st edition. 584 pages. 9.50x6.50x1.50 inches. In Stock.

Buch. Condizione: Neu. Neuware - Is science unified or disunified Over the last century, the question has raised the interest (and hackles) of scientists, philosophers, historians, and sociologists of science, for at stake is how science and society fit together. Recent years have seen a turn largely against the rhetoric of unity, ranging from the please of condensed matter physicists for disciplinary autonomy all the way to discussions in the humanities and social sciences that involve local history, feminism, multiculturalism, postmodernism, scientific relativism and realism, and social constructivism. Many of these varied aspects of the debate over the disunity of science are reflected in this volume, which brings together a number of scholars studying science who otherwise have had little to say to each other: feminist theorists, philosophers of science, sociologists of science. How does the context of discover shape knowledge What are the philosophical consequences of a disunified science Does, for example, an antirealism, a realism, or an arealism become defensible within a picture of local scientific knowledge What politics lies behind and follows from a picture of the world of science more like a quilt than a pyramid Who gains and loses if representation of science has standards that vary from place to place, field to field, and practitioner to practitioner.