Linus hellwig (7 risultati)

Condizione: New.

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Seminar paper from the year 2017 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: 1,0, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), language: English, abstract: In the first essay of the collection Hegel: Three Studies, Adorno evaluates Hegel's philosophy in the following way: 'Hegel, in many respects, [is] a Kant who came to himself'1. He justifies this verdict with the claim that Hegel succeeded in following the inner logic of the transcendental philosophy much more consistently than Kant himself. His idealism was not simply imposed on Kant's philosophy and thus using it as a shaky foundation for a foreign superstructure. Instead, Hegel had sensitively reacted to Kant's inherent contradictions and resentments and subsequently presented them coherently in his dialectics and made them usable for him - or one might even say, he 'sublated' it. In my examination of the negative dialectics, I have repeatedly come to a similar assessment towards Adorno. He too was able to react productively on the inconsistencies and gross misconceptions in Hegel's philosophy in his critical approach to Hegel, by which he measured and instructed his own dialectical philosophy on the Hegelian. He was always aware of the danger that the productive reception of Hegelian motifs and dialectical methods would lead to a dull epigonism if it did not consistently align itself with the original contents of his philosophy. In the present work, I would like to prove that Adorno's assessment of the relationship between Hegel and Kant also applies to his relationship to Hegel, i.e. that Adorno can and should be called - in a certain polemic way - a Hegel who came to himself. His negative dialectics convert Hegel's speculative philosophy into the modern philosophical discourse without being guilty of cherry picking. It does so by clearing Hegelian philosophy of its imperfections and enriching it with the political experience of the twentieth century. It is my goal to show with a genealogy of negative dialectics, its reference points to Hegel and to prove that Adorno's dialectic is a legitimate heir of Hegelian philosophy. In addition to Adorno's work Negative Dialectics, I will pay special attention to his Lectures on Negative Dialectics, because, as Adorno states himself, not only the 'methodical observation' and the 'fundamental considerations' of his negative dialectics are presented there, but also the development process of Negative Dialectics is considered.…

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - Essay aus dem Jahr 2016 im Fachbereich Philosophie - Philosophie außerhalb der abendländischen Tradition, Note: 1,0, Universität Wien (Institut für Philosophie), Sprache: Deutsch, Abstract: 'Das Dao, von dem wir sprechen können, ist nicht das ewige Dao', diese Eröffnungszeilen des Dàodéjing sind, ähnlich wie das Werk selbst, so tief im chinesischen Bildungskanon verankert, dass sie sogar von der illiteraten Bevölkerung wiedererkannt werden. Und tatsächlich spiegeln sich, wie sich später zeigen lässt, viele wichtige Ansätze L oz s bereits in diesen Zeilen wieder. Im Folgenden möchte ich von dem ersten der insgesamt 81 Kapitel ausgehen, um über das Dàodéjing zu reflektieren, da hier meiner Meinung nach bereits das philosophische Fundament des Werkes angelegt wurde. Allerdings stoße ich dabei sogleich auf eine Hürde, über die L oz in einer besonderen Weise sinniert: das Problem der Sprache.Denn so wie sich das wahre Dào in seiner Ursprünglichkeit genuin jeder begrifflichen Fixierung entzieht, so entziehen sich mir die ursprünglichen Begriffe, mit denen L oz um schätzungsweise 400 v. Chr. den Versuch unternommen hat, vom Dào zu sprechen.Schon in seiner Sprachgenetik ist das Dàodéjing so vieldeutig angelegt, dass unter Sinologen selektiv die Vermutung aufkeimte, zur Zeit L oz s herrschte ein mündlich überliefertes grammatikalisches Verständnis vor, das eine Interpunktion der Schriftzeichen erübrig hat, uns aber heute leider verloren gegangen sei. Erschwerend kommt hinzu, dass sich die chinesische Sprache so grundsätzlich von den europäischen unterscheidet, dass ein Übersetzer interpretativ vorgehen muss und somit unvermeidlich sein philosophisches Vorverständnis in den Text hineinprojiziert. An diesem Punkt jedoch eröffnet sich ein Ausweg durch die Hilfe eines hermeneutischen Winkelzugs: Betrachtet man die vorhandenen Übersetzungen als Deutungsvarianten des Dàodéjing, so lässt sich wenigstens durch ein komparatives Vorgehen der Sinn dieses Werkes für eine bestimmte Bevölkerungsgruppe zu einer bestimmten Zeit ermitteln - im Falle dieses Essays also für die Europäer im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Schließlich läuft man mit dieser Bescheidenheit auch nicht Gefahr, zu einem vermeintlich endgültigen Textverständnis zu gelangen, das zum einen sicher nicht im Interesse eines Verfassers gelegen hätte, der im Wandel das wirkmächtigste Prinzip des Kosmos begreift, und zum anderen den lebenserhaltenden Diskurs zum Erliegen bringen würde, der die Rezeptionsgeschichte dieses Werkes über 2400 Jahre lang anhalten ließ.…

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2017 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: 1,0, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), language: English, abstract: In the first essay of the collection Hegel: Three Studies, Adorno evaluates Hegel's philosophy in the following way: 'Hegel, in many respects, [is] a Kant who came to himself'1. He justifies this verdict with the claim that Hegel succeeded in following the inner logic of the transcendental philosophy much more consistently than Kant himself. His idealism was not simply imposed on Kant's philosophy and thus using it as a shaky foundation for a foreign superstructure. Instead, Hegel had sensitively reacted to Kant's inherent contradictions and resentments and subsequently presented them coherently in his dialectics and made them usable for him - or one might even say, he 'sublated' it. In my examination of the negative dialectics, I have repeatedly come to a similar assessment towards Adorno. He too was able to react productively on the inconsistencies and gross misconceptions in Hegel's philosophy in his critical approach to Hegel, by which he measured and instructed his own dialectical philosophy on the Hegelian. He was always aware of the danger that the productive reception of Hegelian motifs and dialectical methods would lead to a dull epigonism if it did not consistently align itself with the original contents of his philosophy. In the present work, I would like to prove that Adorno's assessment of the relationship between Hegel and Kant also applies to his relationship to Hegel, i.e. that Adorno can and should be called - in a certain polemic way - a Hegel who came to himself. His negative dialectics convert Hegel's speculative philosophy into the modern philosophical discourse without being guilty of cherry picking. It does so by clearing Hegelian philosophy of its imperfections and enriching it with the political experience of the twentieth century. It is my goal to show with a genealogy of negative dialectics, its reference points to Hegel and to prove that Adorno's dialectic is a legitimate heir of Hegelian philosophy. In addition to Adorno's work Negative Dialectics, I will pay special attention to his Lectures on Negative Dialectics, because, as Adorno states himself, not only the 'methodical observation' and the 'fundamental considerations' of his negative dialectics are presented there, but also the development process of Negative Dialectics is considered. 20 pp. Englisch. …

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -Seminar paper from the year 2017 in the subject Philosophy - Theoretical (Realisation, Science, Logic, Language), grade: 1,0, University of Vienna (Institut für Philosophie), language: English, abstract: In the first essay of the collection Hegel: Three Studies, Adorno evaluates Hegel's philosophy in the following way: 'Hegel, in many respects, [is] a Kant who came to himself'1. He justifies this verdict with the claim that Hegel succeeded in following the inner logic of the transcendental philosophy much more consistently than Kant himself. His idealism was not simply imposed on Kant's philosophy and thus using it as a shaky foundation for a foreign superstructure. Instead, Hegel had sensitively reacted to Kant's inherent contradictions and resentments and subsequently presented them coherently in his dialectics and made them usable for him ¿ or one might even say, he ¿sublated¿ it. In my examination of the negative dialectics, I have repeatedly come to a similar assessment towards Adorno. He too was able to react productively on the inconsistencies and gross misconceptions in Hegel¿s philosophy in his critical approach to Hegel, by which he measured and instructed his own dialectical philosophy on the Hegelian. He was always aware of the danger that the productive reception of Hegelian motifs and dialectical methods would lead to a dull epigonism if it did not consistently align itself with the original contents of his philosophy. In the present work, I would like to prove that Adorno's assessment of the relationship between Hegel and Kant also applies to his relationship to Hegel, i.e. that Adorno can and should be called ¿ in a certain polemic way ¿ a Hegel who came to himself. His negative dialectics convert Hegel's speculative philosophy into the modern philosophical discourse without being guilty of cherry picking. It does so by clearing Hegelian philosophy of its imperfections and enriching it with the political experience of the twentieth century. It is my goal to show with a genealogy of negative dialectics, its reference points to Hegel and to prove that Adorno's dialectic is a legitimate heir of Hegelian philosophy. In addition to Adorno's work Negative Dialectics, I will pay special attention to his Lectures on Negative Dialectics, because, as Adorno states himself, not only the 'methodical observation' and the 'fundamental considerations' of his negative dialectics are presented there, but also the development process of Negative Dialectics is considered.Books on Demand GmbH, Überseering 33, 22297 Hamburg 20 pp. Englisch. …

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Hegel and the Logic of Decay. A Genealogy of Adorno's Negative Dialectics | Linus Hellwig | Taschenbuch | 20 S. | Englisch | 2018 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783668781177 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: GRIN Publishing GmbH, Waltherstr. 23, 80337 München, info[at]grin[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Über das erste Kapitel des Dàodéj¿ng | "Das Dao, von dem wir sprechen können, ist nicht das ewige Dao" | Linus Hellwig | Taschenbuch | 16 S. | Deutsch | 2018 | GRIN Verlag | EAN 9783668777415 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: GRIN Publishing GmbH, Waltherstr. 23, 80337 München, info[at]grin[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …