publishing scienslate (75 risultati)

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Your dream dictionary is lying to you - and so is the scientist who says your dreams mean nothing.Every night, the human brain stages an elaborate production: emotionally charged, narratively organized, and stubbornly memorable. For most of recorded history, people assumed this meant something. Modern skeptics pushed back hard. Neither side, it turns out, was asking the right question.What Science Says About. Dream Interpretation cuts through both the overclaiming and the dismissal to examine what sleep science, cognitive neuroscience, and psychology have actually established about the dreaming mind. The evidence is more interesting than the debunkers admit - and considerably more modest than the dream symbol industry would have you believe. The sleeping brain is doing real, measurable work. What that work means for the individual who woke up from a troubling dream at 3 a.m. is a separate question, and the answer requires more care than most sources are willing to take.The research covered here spans fifty years of sleep laboratory findings, neuroimaging studies that have reconstructed dream images directly from brain activity, and large-scale analyses of thousands of dream reports. It includes the genuine discoveries - emotional tone in dreams tracks mood disorders with measurable reliability, recurring themes correlate with psychological stress, and the continuity between waking concerns and dream content is one of the field's most replicated findings. It also includes the failures: the foundational studies that turned out to be artifacts of methodology, the psychoanalytic framework that dominated clinical practice for half a century without ever being testable, and the wellness industry's habit of stripping scientific caveats until nothing accurate remains.The stakes are not merely academic. Dream interpretation in clinical settings has caused documented harm - including its role in recovered memory controversies. New neuroimaging technologies raise questions about who owns the content of a person's mind during sleep, and whether legal frameworks built for a different era are equipped to handle them. And millions of people are making real decisions - about their mental health, their relationships, their sense of self - guided by dream symbol systems that controlled studies have consistently failed to validate.Inside, you'll discover: - Why every known human culture developed a framework for reading dreams, and what that cross-cultural consistency actually tells us about the brain - What neuroimaging studies have genuinely achieved in reconstructing dream content from brain activity - and where they remain severely limited - Why the claim that specific symbols carry universal meanings has no scientific basis, and why the human mind finds these systems compelling anyway - What the evidence actually permits: the modest but real conclusions that survive rigorous scrutiny - How legitimate research findings get distorted as they travel from peer-reviewed journals to clinical practice to social media - Why dream science is an active field of genuine empirical disagreement - not a settled question in either directionWhat Science Says About. is a series for readers who want the science without the mythology - evidence assessed clearly, uncertainty acknowledged honestly, and the difference between what a study shows and what it gets used to claim kept visible throughout. Each book in the series brings the same standard of rigor to a different subject where popular understanding has drifted far from what the research supports.If you've ever suspected that the real story about dreaming is more complicated than either the symbol dictionaries or the dismissive neuroscientists suggest, this book is for you. This item is prin Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

PAP. Condizione: New. New Book. Shipped from UK. Established seller since 2000.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Your dream dictionary is lying to you - and so is the scientist who says your dreams mean nothing.Every night, the human brain stages an elaborate production: emotionally charged, narratively organized, and stubbornly memorable. For most of recorded history, people assumed this meant something. Modern skeptics pushed back hard. Neither side, it turns out, was asking the right question.What Science Says About. Dream Interpretation cuts through both the overclaiming and the dismissal to examine what sleep science, cognitive neuroscience, and psychology have actually established about the dreaming mind. The evidence is more interesting than the debunkers admit - and considerably more modest than the dream symbol industry would have you believe. The sleeping brain is doing real, measurable work. What that work means for the individual who woke up from a troubling dream at 3 a.m. is a separate question, and the answer requires more care than most sources are willing to take.The research covered here spans fifty years of sleep laboratory findings, neuroimaging studies that have reconstructed dream images directly from brain activity, and large-scale analyses of thousands of dream reports. It includes the genuine discoveries - emotional tone in dreams tracks mood disorders with measurable reliability, recurring themes correlate with psychological stress, and the continuity between waking concerns and dream content is one of the field's most replicated findings. It also includes the failures: the foundational studies that turned out to be artifacts of methodology, the psychoanalytic framework that dominated clinical practice for half a century without ever being testable, and the wellness industry's habit of stripping scientific caveats until nothing accurate remains.The stakes are not merely academic. Dream interpretation in clinical settings has caused documented harm - including its role in recovered memory controversies. New neuroimaging technologies raise questions about who owns the content of a person's mind during sleep, and whether legal frameworks built for a different era are equipped to handle them. And millions of people are making real decisions - about their mental health, their relationships, their sense of self - guided by dream symbol systems that controlled studies have consistently failed to validate.Inside, you'll discover: - Why every known human culture developed a framework for reading dreams, and what that cross-cultural consistency actually tells us about the brain - What neuroimaging studies have genuinely achieved in reconstructing dream content from brain activity - and where they remain severely limited - Why the claim that specific symbols carry universal meanings has no scientific basis, and why the human mind finds these systems compelling anyway - What the evidence actually permits: the modest but real conclusions that survive rigorous scrutiny - How legitimate research findings get distorted as they travel from peer-reviewed journals to clinical practice to social media - Why dream science is an active field of genuine empirical disagreement - not a settled question in either directionWhat Science Says About. is a series for readers who want the science without the mythology - evidence assessed clearly, uncertainty acknowledged honestly, and the difference between what a study shows and what it gets used to claim kept visible throughout. Each book in the series brings the same standard of rigor to a different subject where popular understanding has drifted far from what the research supports.If you've ever suspected that the real story about dreaming is more complicated than either the symbol dictionaries or the dismissive neuroscientists suggest, this book is for you. This Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Is hypnosis a genuine window into the brain's hidden machinery - or the most elaborately sustained illusion in the history of science?For more than two centuries, hypnosis has occupied an uncomfortable position: too strange for mainstream science to fully embrace, too persistent to dismiss. Clinicians use it in operating rooms. Psychologists study it in laboratories. Entertainers built careers on its theatrical possibilities. And yet the fundamental question - what is actually happening inside a hypnotized person - remains, astonishingly, unresolved. The phenomenon refuses to behave like a fringe topic. The science refuses to behave like a settled one.What controlled research has established is more precise, and more surprising, than either believers or skeptics tend to acknowledge. Neuroimaging studies have confirmed that hypnotic analgesia produces measurable changes in the brain's pain-processing regions - changes that precede the subject's verbal report and cannot be explained by social compliance alone. The anterior cingulate cortex, a region central to how the brain evaluates pain as urgent or ignorable, responds differently in people under hypnotic suggestion. Something real is happening. The dispute is about what it means.The research has also produced findings that should trouble anyone who uses hypnosis therapeutically. Memory retrieved under hypnosis is not more accurate than ordinary recall - it is systematically less accurate, and reliably more convincing to the person holding it. The combination of increased confidence and decreased accuracy has produced false accusations, shattered families, and wrongful legal proceedings. This is not a rare side effect. It is a documented, predictable consequence of how hypnotic suggestion interacts with memory's reconstructive architecture. The most defensible clinical applications of hypnosis are narrower than practitioners commonly claim - and considerably more real than skeptics are prepared to admit.At its center, this is a book about what happens when a scientifically serious phenomenon refuses to fit neatly into existing frameworks - and what that refusal reveals about the limits of current neuroscience, the complexity of individual difference, and the degree to which social context participates in producing biological outcomes.Inside, you'll discover: - Why the brain's predictive machinery may explain how a suggestion can genuinely alter what a person feels, rather than merely changing what they report- What neuroimaging has - and has not - settled about the century-old debate over whether hypnosis produces a real altered state- Why hypnotic susceptibility is a stable, heritable trait distributed unevenly across the population, and what that means for anyone considering it as a clinical tool- How the recovered memory crisis of the 1980s and 1990s exposed the specific danger of combining hypnotic suggestion with therapeutic trust- Which conditions - chronic pain, procedural anxiety, irritable bowel syndrome - have accumulated enough rigorous evidence to justify serious clinical consideration- Why the state-versus-non-state debate has organized a century of research without producing a winner, and what that ongoing disagreement reveals about the science of consciousness itselfWhat Science Says About Hypnosis is part of the What Science Says About series by Scienslate - a collection of evidence-first books designed to replace received wisdom with a clear-eyed account of what research actually shows, including where it runs out. Each title in the series applies the same editorial standard: no hype, no dismissal, and no pretending the hard questions are easier than they are.Read it to find out what the evidence actually Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. Why does waking up unable to move - with a shadow figure looming over you - feel identical whether you're in rural Nigeria, medieval England, or a Tokyo apartment?Every culture in human history has found a name for it. The Old Hag. The Night Demon. Kanashibari. The details change; the experience doesn't. And for decades, mainstream medicine filed it under "bad dream" and moved on. The neuroscience tells a very different story.Sleep paralysis is not a fringe phenomenon. It affects an estimated eight percent of the general population - and significantly higher rates in people with anxiety, PTSD, and disrupted sleep schedules. It sits at the intersection of REM neuroscience, threat-perception psychology, and cultural belief systems, and it turns out to be one of the most scientifically revealing experiences the sleeping brain can produce. The consistency of its hallucinations across centuries and continents is not folklore. It is data.What the research actually shows is more interesting - and more unsettling - than either the supernatural accounts or the casual dismissals suggest. The paralysis has a precise neurological mechanism: a failure of state-boundary maintenance in which the motor suppression of REM sleep persists into conscious awareness. The hallucinations are not random; they map onto the brain's threat-detection architecture with an almost architectural regularity. The crushing chest pressure, the dark presence, the inability to cry out - these are not symptoms of a disturbed mind. They are what a healthy brain produces when it wakes up before it has finished being asleep.The stakes are real. For a significant minority of experiencers, sleep paralysis causes lasting harm - anticipatory anxiety, chronic sleep avoidance, impaired daily functioning - and the clinical response has historically been inadequate. Meanwhile, the condition has been colonized by wellness culture, alien abduction narratives, and astral projection communities in ways that actively obstruct help-seeking. Understanding what the science actually says is not an academic exercise. It is, for many readers, the first step toward a night that doesn't frighten them.Inside, you'll discover: - Why the brain generates the same three hallucination types across every culture, and what that consistency reveals about threat-perception neuroscience - How the accidental discovery of REM sleep in a mid-century Chicago laboratory set the stage for finally understanding a phenomenon humans had been terrified by for millennia - Why cultural context is not merely psychological background but a genuine neurological variable that determines how distressing an episode becomes - What the evidence actually supports about reducing sleep paralysis frequency - and which popular interventions have no credible science behind them - Where sleep researchers genuinely disagree, what evidence would resolve those disputes, and why the methodological challenges may be harder to overcome than the science communicators admit - What sleep paralysis continues to reveal about the hardest unsolved problems in consciousness researchWhat Science Says About. is a nonfiction series committed to one editorial standard: telling readers what the evidence actually shows, including where it runs out. Each book in the series covers a subject surrounded by myth, misrepresentation, or misplaced certainty - and replaces it with a precise, honest account of what science has and hasn't established.If you've ever woken up paralyzed and needed to understand why, or if you simply want to know what one of the brain's strangest experiences reveals about how the mind constructs reality, this book was written for you. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. The most studied altered state in neuroscience is also the most misrepresented - and the gap between what the research actually shows and what gets said about it is the story this book tells.Every year, millions of people report the same thing: floating above their own bodies, watching themselves from outside, seeing the room with impossible clarity while their physical eyes are closed or their brain is compromised. The experience is consistent across cultures, across centuries, and across people with no history of neurological disorder. It is also, depending on who you ask, either proof that consciousness survives death or a predictable artifact of a brain under stress. Science has spent decades working out which of these is closer to the truth - and the answer is more precise, and more interesting, than either side of that argument acknowledges.What the research has actually built is a detailed mechanistic account of how the brain constructs the ordinary sense of being a self located inside a body - and what happens, specifically and predictably, when that construction fails. The temporal-parietal junction, a convergence zone where proprioception, vestibular signals, vision, and touch are continuously arbitrated, turns out to be the critical hub. Disrupt it - through electrical stimulation, stroke, oxygen deprivation, or even the partial overlap of REM sleep with waking consciousness - and the felt self can become unmoored from the physical body in ways that are vivid, spatially precise, and emotionally overwhelming. That is not speculation. It is among the better-supported findings in contemporary consciousness research.What the research has not built is evidence that the displaced self actually perceives the environment from outside the body. The most rigorous prospective study ever designed to test that claim - placing visual targets where only a genuinely floating observer could see them - produced a null result on its primary experimental question. The high-profile cases that appear in popular accounts survive scrutiny less well than their advocates suggest. The logical distance between "the brain generates an experience of leaving the body" and "consciousness operates independently of the brain" is enormous, and the argumentative moves that cross it without acknowledging the distance are specific, identifiable, and wrong in documentable ways. This book maps them.Inside, you'll discover: - Why the brain's ordinary sense of being located inside a body is a construction, not a given - and how OBEs reveal the machinery that normally keeps it invisible- What the AWARE study actually found, and why it matters that the primary experimental result was negative- How reliable laboratory procedures now induce OBE-like states in healthy, neurologically normal people - and what that does and doesn't tell us about the spontaneous experience- Why the hard problem of consciousness is genuinely open while the specific empirical claims made from OBE research are not- The real clinical applications of OBE science - in anesthesia, depersonalization disorder, phantom limb pain, and stroke rehabilitation - that receive almost no attention in popular accounts- Where legitimate scientific disagreement exists, where it has been misrepresented, and how to tell the differenceWhat Science Says About. is a series built on one principle: that the most respectful thing a science book can do is tell you what the evidence actually shows, including where it falls short. If this book's subject interests you, the series has more to offer.Read it if you want to know what science has genuinely learned about one of the strangest experiences the human brain produces. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. If reality is indistinguishable from a perfect simulation, there may be no experiment that could ever prove otherwise - and some physicists think that matters.The hypothesis that our universe might be a vast computational construct was once the territory of science fiction. It is no longer. Philosophers, physicists, and computer scientists have developed formal arguments for why a simulated universe is not only conceivable but, under certain assumptions about the nature of intelligence and computation, statistically probable. The question has moved from "is this worth taking seriously?" to "what would it mean if it were true?"Simulation theory sits at a strange crossroads: it is taken seriously by researchers at major universities, has been cited in peer-reviewed physics literature, and yet remains deeply contested. The most rigorous version of the argument - the trilemma - does not claim the universe is a simulation. It claims that at least one of three uncomfortable propositions must be true, and that the least unsettling of the three may be simulation. Quantum mechanics, with its observer-dependent behavior and discrete Planck-scale structure, has led some physicists to ask whether the universe behaves more like a rendered system than a continuous physical one. Others find the comparison superficial and the entire framework unfalsifiable - which, in science, is a serious charge.What the research actually reveals is a set of open questions that mainstream science has not resolved. Attempts to find computational artifacts in the laws of physics - signatures that would suggest underlying code - have produced inconclusive results. Tests proposed by physicists like Silas Beane suggest there may be detectable limits to the universe's resolution, analogous to pixels. Whether these tests are even theoretically possible is itself debated. What is not debated is that the philosophy of mind and the physics of information have converged on a shared problem: the nature of reality at its most fundamental level remains genuinely unsettled.For the general reader, the stakes are not purely academic. If the simulation hypothesis forces us to reconsider what "physical" means, what counts as real, and whether the laws of nature are discovered or designed, then it is one of the few ideas in modern thought that touches both science and the deepest questions human beings ask about existence. This book does not ask you to believe the hypothesis - it asks you to understand why serious thinkers have refused to dismiss it.Inside, you'll discover: - The formal trilemma argument and what it actually claims - and doesn't claim - about the nature of reality- Why quantum mechanics has led some physicists to entertain the idea of a computed universe- The proposed experiments designed to detect evidence of simulation, and why they may be impossible to run- How information theory has changed the way physicists talk about matter, space, and time- The strongest objections to simulation theory - and how its proponents respond- What the hypothesis shares with, and how it differs from, earlier philosophical traditions about the nature of realityWhat Science Says About. is a series for readers who want rigorous engagement with ideas that sit at the edge of what science can currently answer. If this one resonates, the series covers a range of subjects where the evidence is real, the debate is live, and the conclusions are anything but settled.Scroll up and start reading. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.

Condizione: New. Print on Demand.