9781316632802 - Structured to Fail?: Regulatory Performance under Competing Mandates di Carrigan, Christopher (25 risultati)

Paperback. Condizione: New. The item is brand new, never used or read. It's in perfect condition and may include supplements and/or access codes or come shrink-wrapped.

Condizione: Very Good. Item in very good condition! Textbooks may not include supplemental items i.e. CDs, access codes etc.

Paperback. Condizione: Very Good. No Jacket. May have limited writing in cover pages. Pages are unmarked. ~ ThriftBooks: Read More, Spend Less.

Paperback. Condizione: Very Good. It's a well-cared-for item that has seen limited use. The item may show minor signs of wear. All the text is legible, with all pages included. It may have slight markings and/or highlighting.

Soft cover. Condizione: Very good. No jacket. Occasional marks in margins, overall very good condition.

Paperback. Condizione: Like New. First Edition. Bright and clean, firm and square, just a few very minor rubs and bumps. Hence a non-text page is stamped 'damaged'. Despite such this book is actually in nearly new condition. Thus it looks and feels unread with contents that are crisp, fresh and tight. Now offered for sale at a special bargain price.

Condizione: Brand New. New. US edition. Expediting shipping for all USA and Europe orders excluding PO Box. Excellent Customer Service.

Condizione: New. pp. 280.

Condizione: New. This is a Brand-new US Edition. This Item may be shipped from US or any other country as we have multiple locations worldwide.

Condizione: New. pp. 280.

Condizione: New.

Condizione: New. Brand New Original US Edition. Customer service! Satisfaction Guaranteed.

Condizione: New. Brand New Original US Edition. Customer service! Satisfaction Guaranteed.

Condizione: New. pp. 280.

Condizione: New. This book employs a diverse set of research methods to confront widely accepted principles of regulatory agency design. Num Pages: 280 pages. BIC Classification: JPP; KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Paperback. . . . .

Condizione: New. In.

Condizione: New. This book employs a diverse set of research methods to confront widely accepted principles of regulatory agency design. Num Pages: 280 pages. BIC Classification: JPP; KC. Category: (P) Professional & Vocational. Dimension: 228 x 152. . . 2017. Paperback. . . . . Books ship from the US and Ireland.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 320 pages. 9.00x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock.

Paperback. Condizione: New. Brand New ! Fast Delivery "International Edition " and ship within 24-48 hours. Deliver by FedEx and Dhl, & Aramex, UPS, & USPS and we do accept APO and PO BOX Addresses. Order can be delivered worldwide within 4-6 Working days .and we do have flat rate for up to 2LB. Extra shipping charges will be requested This Item May be shipped from India, United states & United Kingdom. Depending on your location and availability.

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to develop important conclusions for policy. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from multiple locations in the US or from the UK, depending on stock availability.

Paperback. Condizione: Brand New. 320 pages. 9.00x6.25x0.75 inches. In Stock. This item is printed on demand.

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to develop important conclusions for policy. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our UK warehouse or from our Australian or US warehouses, depending on stock availability.

Condizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to .

Paperback. Condizione: new. Paperback. In the search for explanations for three of the most pressing crises of the early twenty-first century (the housing meltdown and financial crisis, the Gulf oil spill, and the nuclear disaster at Fukushima), commentators pointed to the structure of the regulatory agencies charged with overseeing the associated industries, noting that the need to balance competing regulatory and non-regulatory missions undermined each agency's ability to be an effective regulator. Christopher Carrigan challenges this critique by employing a diverse set of research methods, including a statistical analysis, an in-depth case study of US regulatory oversight of offshore oil and gas development leading up to the Gulf oil spill, and a formal theoretical discussion, to systematically evaluate the benefits and concerns associated with either combining or separating regulatory and non-regulatory missions. His analysis demonstrates for policymakers and scholars why assigning competing non-regulatory missions to regulatory agencies can still be better than separating them in some cases. Carrigan systematically challenges accepted principles of regulatory design by combining a statistical analysis of a broad set of US agencies with an in-depth case study of the role of the Minerals Management Service in the 2010 Gulf of Mexico oil spill to develop important conclusions for policy. This item is printed on demand. Shipping may be from our Sydney, NSW warehouse or from our UK or US warehouse, depending on stock availability.