Isbn: 9789027710956 - galileo and the art of reasoning: rhetorical foundation of logic and scientific method: 61 (14 risultati)

Printed Glossy Card. Condizione: Good+. 1st ed. Issued as Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science Volume 61. xx+478+(3, series list); very extensive but also light and easily eraseable pencil marginal marking, underlining and short comments throughout, some of which may actually be of interest, a little shallow vertical creasing up to p.10, otherwise internally clean and tight; covers clean but front has a vertical crease mark and all edges very slightly rubbed. Uncommon. Note: quoted shipping rates are calculated for 500-700 gram net weight, cost will be modified up or down as appropriate outside this range. Size: 15 Cm x 22 Cm. …

Paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Clean pages except for some foxing and pale droplet marks on the outside edges of the page block; no owners' marks; soft cover shows a short crease and a small surface tear at the bottom right front, toning visible at rear, a short laminate peel at the top left rear, and mild edgewear, otherwise sound. xx, 478pp. incl. index.…

Condizione: Very Good. - Cornersand spine ends bumped w/ slight creasing - Covers a little rubbed and toned - Previous owner's bookplate on inside front cover - Book ow/ solid, clean and bright - xx/478 pages.

Condizione: New. In English.

kart. Condizione: Gut. en. XX, 478 S. In English language. Paperback edition. Former library copy with external labelings removed from boards with clean text and well preserved. Signature stamps and inscriptions on end-papers, title and page edges. + + + Paperback-Ausgabe. Ordentlich ausgesondertes Bibliotheksexemplar mit entfernten äußerlichen Kennzeichnungen. Einband part. etwas nachgedunkelt, sonst augenscheinlich ungelesen und sehr gut erhalten. Signatur- / Entwidmungsstempel a. Vorsatz, Titel und Schnitt. 9027710953 Werktäglicher Versand. Jede Lieferung m. ordentl. Rechnung und ausgew. MwSt. Der Versand erfolgt als Büchersendung / Einschreiben mit der Deutschen Post bzw. als Päckchen / Paket mit DHL. Die Lieferzeit ist abhängig von der Versandart und beträgt innerhalb Deutschlands 3-5 Tage, in der EU 5 - 12 Tage. KEIN Versand an Packstationen. Körperschaften und juristische Personen werden auf Wunsch per offener Rechnung beliefert. ***ATTENTION U.S. CUSTOMERS: Due to the new tariffs, we are unable to ship packages to the USA at this time. Thank you for understanding.*** Sprache: Englisch Gewicht in Gramm: 550.…

Condizione: New. pp. 504.

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Druck auf Anfrage Neuware - Printed after ordering - The work of Galileo has long been important not only as a foundation of modern physics but also as a model - and perhaps the paradigmatic model - of scientific method, and therefore as a leading example of scientific rationality. However, as we know, the matter is not so simple. The range of Galileo readings is so varied that one may be led to the conclusion that it is a case of chacun a son Galileo; that here, as with the Bible, or Plato or Kant or Freud or Finnegan's Wake, the texts themselves underdetermine just what moral is to be pointed. But if there is no canonical reading, how can the texts be taken as evidence or example of a canonical view of scientific rationality, as in Galileo Or is it the case, instead, that we decide a priori what the norms of rationality are and then pick through texts to fmd those which satisfy these norms Specifically, how and on what grounds are we to accept or reject scientific theories, or scientific reasoning If we are to do this on the basis of historical analysis of how, in fact, theories came to be accepted or rejected, how shall we distinguish 'is' from 'ought' What follows (if anything does) from such analysis or reconstruction about how theories ought to be accepted or rejected Maurice Finocchiaro's study of Galileo brings an important and original approach to the question of scientific rationality by way of a systematic read.…

Paperback. Condizione: Very Good. Dust Jacket may NOT BE INCLUDED.CDs may be missing. SHIPS FROM MULTIPLE LOCATIONS. book.

Kartoniert / Broschiert. Condizione: New. Dieser Artikel ist ein Print on Demand Artikel und wird nach Ihrer Bestellung fuer Sie gedruckt. The work of Galileo has long been important not only as a foundation of modern physics but also as a model - and perhaps the paradigmatic model - of scientific method, and therefore as a leading example of scientific rationality. However, as we know, the ma.…

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. Galileo and the Art of Reasoning | Rhetorical Foundation of Logic and Scientific Method | M. A. Finocchiaro | Taschenbuch | Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science | xx | Englisch | 1980 | Springer | EAN 9789027710956 | Verantwortliche Person für die EU: Springer Verlag GmbH, Tiergartenstr. 17, 69121 Heidelberg, juergen[dot]hartmann[at]springer[dot]com | Anbieter: preigu Print on Demand. …

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - Print on Demand Titel. Neuware -The work of Galileo has long been important not only as a foundation of modern physics but also as a model - and perhaps the paradigmatic model - of scientific method, and therefore as a leading example of scientific rationality. However, as we know, the matter is not so simple. The range of Galileo readings is so varied that one may be led to the conclusion that it is a case of chacun a son Galileo; that here, as with the Bible, or Plato or Kant or Freud or Finnegan's Wake, the texts themselves underdetermine just what moral is to be pointed. But if there is no canonical reading, how can the texts be taken as evidence or example of a canonical view of scientific rationality, as in Galileo Or is it the case, instead, that we decide a priori what the norms of rationality are and then pick through texts to fmd those which satisfy these norms Specifically, how and on what grounds are we to accept or reject scientific theories, or scientific reasoning If we are to do this on the basis of historical analysis of how, in fact, theories came to be accepted or rejected, how shall we distinguish 'is' from 'ought' What follows (if anything does) from such analysis or reconstruction about how theories ought to be accepted or rejected Maurice Finocchiaro's study of Galileo brings an important and original approach to the question of scientific rationality by way of a systematic readSpringer-Verlag KG, Sachsenplatz 4-6, 1201 Wien 504 pp. Englisch.…

Condizione: New. Print on Demand pp. 504 49:B&W 6.14 x 9.21 in or 234 x 156 mm (Royal 8vo) Perfect Bound on White w/Gloss Lam.

Condizione: New. PRINT ON DEMAND pp. 504.

Taschenbuch. Condizione: Neu. This item is printed on demand - it takes 3-4 days longer - Neuware -The work of Galileo has long been important not only as a foundation of modern physics but also as a model - and perhaps the paradigmatic model - of scientific method, and therefore as a leading example of scientific rationality. However, as we know, the matter is not so simple. The range of Galileo readings is so varied that one may be led to the conclusion that it is a case of chacun a son Galileo; that here, as with the Bible, or Plato or Kant or Freud or Finnegan's Wake, the texts themselves underdetermine just what moral is to be pointed. But if there is no canonical reading, how can the texts be taken as evidence or example of a canonical view of scientific rationality, as in Galileo Or is it the case, instead, that we decide a priori what the norms of rationality are and then pick through texts to fmd those which satisfy these norms Specifically, how and on what grounds are we to accept or reject scientific theories, or scientific reasoning If we are to do this on the basis of historical analysis of how, in fact, theories came to be accepted or rejected, how shall we distinguish 'is' from 'ought' What follows (if anything does) from such analysis or reconstruction about how theories ought to be accepted or rejected Maurice Finocchiaro's study of Galileo brings an important and original approach to the question of scientific rationality by way of a systematic read 504 pp. Englisch.…